SkipCaptcha
790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: +
Talk:Presidential debates 2012 (view source)
Revision as of 19:07, September 13, 2012
, 19:07, September 13, 2012→Ideologies of various moderators, "the good/the bad."
Also, a moderator's dietary choices are irrelevant, and calling someone an "affirmative action recipient" without evidence looks petty. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:53, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
Also, a moderator's dietary choices are irrelevant, and calling someone an "affirmative action recipient" without evidence looks petty. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:53, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
:Romney is obviously a RINO, but that doesn't mean that 4 more years of BHO wouldn't be a complete disaster. Why are you reverting my entire edit if your gripes are just nit picking? Fix it if you have problems with it. The biases of the moderators is vitally important and your eagerness to censor the information is telling. [[User:CraigF2|CraigF2]] 15:05, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
:Romney is obviously a RINO, but that doesn't mean that 4 more years of BHO wouldn't be a complete disaster. Why are you reverting my entire edit if your gripes are just nit picking? Fix it if you have problems with it. The biases of the moderators is vitally important and your eagerness to censor the information is telling. [[User:CraigF2|CraigF2]] 15:05, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
::"Telling" of what? The desire to have articles that are concise, with well-written prose that doesn't wander off into sideshows that are best dealt with in a more relevant space? Guilty as charged, then. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 15:07, 13 September 2012 (EDT)