4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 207:
Line 207: + + + + + + + + +
User talk:RJJensen (view source)
Revision as of 16:07, September 16, 2012
, 16:07, September 16, 2012Intro to WeCheck
What made you think that Quebec was south of the US? [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Latin_America&diff=615077&oldid=611106] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:07, 29 July 2010 (EDT)
What made you think that Quebec was south of the US? [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Latin_America&diff=615077&oldid=611106] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:07, 29 July 2010 (EDT)
== WeCheck ==
Hi I thought you may be interested in WeCheck [http://wecheck.org]. Recently, in an effort to counter media bias there has been a huge move to 'fact check' every political claim. But how can we really trust the fact checkers when they are the same journalists who are part of the problem? The solution is to cut out the midddle man and give tools to let the people so they can do the fact checking themselves.
WeCheck in an independent non-partisan system that uses Wikipedia-like collaborative editing to help contributors with all kind of political views work together to fact check speeches and political commentary.
WeCheck works by allowing users to tags and link text to create Fact Check pages. In addition to basic tags such as <nowiki>[[TRUE]]</nowiki>, <nowiki>[[FALSE]]</nowiki> and in between we also have 40 other tags like <nowiki>[[STRAW MAN]]</nowiki>, <nowiki>[[CIRCULAR]]</nowiki>, <nowiki>[[AD HOMINEM]]</nowiki>, <nowiki>[[CORRELATION]]</nowiki>, <nowiki>[[MORAL EQUIVALENCE]]</nowiki>, <nowiki>[[NAZI]]</nowiki>, <nowiki>[[RACE CARD]]</nowiki> etc. which contributors can use to educate other reader to the writer's techniques/manipulations.
I would appreciate your comments and any ideas you may have to help find contributors to promote the site. [[User:Sparkzilla|Sparkzilla]] 12:07, 16 September 2012 (EDT)