Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 653: Line 653:  
:(b) Strongs doesn't provide "us". Translating it as "us" is not translating; it is editorializing.<br />
 
:(b) Strongs doesn't provide "us". Translating it as "us" is not translating; it is editorializing.<br />
 
:(c) If you have 100 people say the following aloud..."For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son" and "For God so loved us that Have gave His only begotten Son", I bet 90+ would think the first sounds better.<br />
 
:(c) If you have 100 people say the following aloud..."For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son" and "For God so loved us that Have gave His only begotten Son", I bet 90+ would think the first sounds better.<br />
−
:(d) God gave His Son for everyone. Not "us". I would argue that "us" builds a wall against non-Christians.<br />
+
:(d) God gave His Son for everyone. Not "us". I would argue that "us" build a wall against non-Christians.<br />
 
:(e) The reason you gave when you changed it was to avoid "false environmentalist overtones".<br />
 
:(e) The reason you gave when you changed it was to avoid "false environmentalist overtones".<br />
 
:So, the question now...the [[best of the public]] thinks this translation is wrong. How do we go about changing it back? [[User:PeterRyan|PeterRyan]] 17:08, 22 September 2012 (EDT)
 
:So, the question now...the [[best of the public]] thinks this translation is wrong. How do we go about changing it back? [[User:PeterRyan|PeterRyan]] 17:08, 22 September 2012 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,219

edits

Navigation menu