Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,135
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: − +
Essay:Voter ID: A Personal Reflection (view source)
Revision as of 03:18, October 3, 2012
, 03:18, October 3, 2012→Identification is necessary for X, and therefore it should be required to vote: PA -> TN is better
Further, voting is a right of citizens, protected under the US Constitution (Amend. XV, Amend. XIX, Amend. XXIV, Amend. XXVI) and Supreme Court decisions (''Baker v. Carr'' [1962], ''Harman v. Forssenius'' [1965], ''Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections'' [1966], ''Dunn v. Blumstein'' [1972], ''Bush v. Gore'' [2000]). Ordinary activities, even ones that are indisputably common activities, are not constitutionally protected like voting.
Further, voting is a right of citizens, protected under the US Constitution (Amend. XV, Amend. XIX, Amend. XXIV, Amend. XXVI) and Supreme Court decisions (''Baker v. Carr'' [1962], ''Harman v. Forssenius'' [1965], ''Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections'' [1966], ''Dunn v. Blumstein'' [1972], ''Bush v. Gore'' [2000]). Ordinary activities, even ones that are indisputably common activities, are not constitutionally protected like voting.
Finally, it should be noted that identification acceptable for other purposes may not be accepted for voting. Many of the strict photo ID laws (such as Pennsylvania's, South Carolina's, and Texas's) require identification from an enumerated list.
Finally, it should be noted that identification acceptable for other purposes may not be accepted for voting. Many of the strict photo ID laws (such as South Carolina's, Tennessee's, and Texas's) require identification from an enumerated list.
=====Doing X with private company Y=====
=====Doing X with private company Y=====