Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: + + + +
→No RINO and no flip-flopper any longer?: new section
Right now, watching the numbers rolling in for Super Tuesday, I think there is a very real possibility of him being the Republican nominee against Obama. If this is the case, will we be able to support him? Obviously, there's no question that he's better than the President. But low enthusiasm for Romney may create low turnout, which will favor Obama and his Obamabots. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 23:49, 6 March 2012 (EST)
Right now, watching the numbers rolling in for Super Tuesday, I think there is a very real possibility of him being the Republican nominee against Obama. If this is the case, will we be able to support him? Obviously, there's no question that he's better than the President. But low enthusiasm for Romney may create low turnout, which will favor Obama and his Obamabots. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 23:49, 6 March 2012 (EST)
== No RINO and no flip-flopper any longer? ==
[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&diff=1010522&oldid=1010022 Congratulations], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitt_Romney&diff=1010703&oldid=1010683 Mr. Romney]! Has Conservapedia predicted somewhere that it would change it stance on Mitt Romney at the eve of the election? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 01:40, 6 October 2012 (EDT)