28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 538:
Line 538: +
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 23:15, October 8, 2012
, 23:15, October 8, 2012→Country of birth: reply
:::::They aren't reliable sources and I'm not even sure they can be counted as a news item. For a claim that the birth certificate has been proven to be false, I expect a media frenzy and a vote of no confidence in Congress. [[User:Nightsky|Nightsky]] 18:47, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
:::::They aren't reliable sources and I'm not even sure they can be counted as a news item. For a claim that the birth certificate has been proven to be false, I expect a media frenzy and a vote of no confidence in Congress. [[User:Nightsky|Nightsky]] 18:47, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
::::::First, you are in no position to judge what is and what is not a reliable source; you're just another individual. Second, their wont be a media frenzy about this subject because the media here is solidly pro-Obama, which is why WND, Newsmax, Fox, Breitbart, and similar organizations labeled "faux" by leftists with severe bias problems are covering the story. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:03, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
::::::First, you are in no position to judge what is and what is not a reliable source; you're just another individual. Second, their wont be a media frenzy about this subject because the media here is solidly pro-Obama, which is why WND, Newsmax, Fox, Breitbart, and similar organizations labeled "faux" by leftists with severe bias problems are covering the story. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:03, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
::::::Meh, they were accused of being Pro-Bush, especially during the WMD intelligence controversy. If a news organisation can break a story as big as this would be, they'll take it. At the moment there's no evidence that it's fake and it's a fringe theory even among Republicans and it's a non-issue. [[User:Nightsky|Nightsky]] 19:15, 8 October 2012 (EDT)