Changes

::::::First, you are in no position to judge what is and what is not a reliable source; you're just another individual.  Second, their wont be a media frenzy about this subject because the media here is solidly pro-Obama, which is why WND, Newsmax, Fox, Breitbart, and similar organizations labeled "faux" by leftists with severe bias problems are covering the story. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:03, 8 October 2012 (EDT)

::::::First, you are in no position to judge what is and what is not a reliable source; you're just another individual.  Second, their wont be a media frenzy about this subject because the media here is solidly pro-Obama, which is why WND, Newsmax, Fox, Breitbart, and similar organizations labeled "faux" by leftists with severe bias problems are covering the story. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:03, 8 October 2012 (EDT)

::::::Meh, they were accused of being Pro-Bush, especially during the WMD intelligence controversy. If a news organisation can break a story as big as this would be, they'll take it. At the moment there's no evidence that it's fake and it's a fringe theory even among Republicans and it's a non-issue. [[User:Nightsky|Nightsky]] 19:15, 8 October 2012 (EDT)

::::::Meh, they were accused of being Pro-Bush, especially during the WMD intelligence controversy. If a news organisation can break a story as big as this would be, they'll take it. At the moment there's no evidence that it's fake and it's a fringe theory even among Republicans and it's a non-issue. [[User:Nightsky|Nightsky]] 19:15, 8 October 2012 (EDT)