Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25:
Line 25: + + + + + +
remove implication that intelligent design is a form of Creationism
Don't delete factual information like that. This is not [[Wikipedia]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:11, 2 January 2008 (EST)
Don't delete factual information like that. This is not [[Wikipedia]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:11, 2 January 2008 (EST)
:"Reversion explained"? You didn't explain anything! I explained why I changed it, the least you can do is the same. [[User:LardoBolger|LardoBolger]] 00:14, 2 January 2008 (EST)
:"Reversion explained"? You didn't explain anything! I explained why I changed it, the least you can do is the same. [[User:LardoBolger|LardoBolger]] 00:14, 2 January 2008 (EST)
==Intelligent design==
The section on his views re: ID imply that ID is a form of creationism. As everyone knows (except those duped by liberals), ID says nothing about creationism. Although it may be an offshoot of "scientific creationism" (or [[Creation Science]]), it now stands completely independent as a scientific theory. Even some agnostics and atheists are ID supporters.
So I'm going to revise this implication out of the Hoyle article.