Block, SkipCaptcha
195
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: +
Response to last word-ism
::::::::: "LowKey", I don't have more time to waste on this. Hoyle exposed the fraud. I hope you're making substantive additions to this encyclopedia.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:15, 15 January 2009 (EST)
::::::::: "LowKey", I don't have more time to waste on this. Hoyle exposed the fraud. I hope you're making substantive additions to this encyclopedia.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:15, 15 January 2009 (EST)
:::::::::: Why waste time supporting assertions when one can simply keep repeating them? I try to make substantive additions, but I keep running into New Standard number 1. Next time please support the accusations or don't make them in the first place.[[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 21:22, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Andy, if Hoyle's scientific pre-eminence is sufficient justification for accepting his conclusions about the Archaeopteryx, should we also accept his conclusions about a steady-state universe and deistic evolution? He ultimately did not reject evolution, merely naturalistic evolution. I on the other hand reject evolution altogether.[[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 19:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Andy, if Hoyle's scientific pre-eminence is sufficient justification for accepting his conclusions about the Archaeopteryx, should we also accept his conclusions about a steady-state universe and deistic evolution? He ultimately did not reject evolution, merely naturalistic evolution. I on the other hand reject evolution altogether.[[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 19:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)