Changes

| pages = 150-153

| pages = 150-153

| url=http://books.google.no/books?id=RUGKBdKawDUC&dq=signature+in+the+cell&hl=en&sa=X&ei=k4o9T-HHFaSF4gTYqpSSCA&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ

| url=http://books.google.no/books?id=RUGKBdKawDUC&dq=signature+in+the+cell&hl=en&sa=X&ei=k4o9T-HHFaSF4gTYqpSSCA&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ

| quote= Gould ... emphasized that historical scientist tested their theories by evaluating their explanatory power.}}</ref> Historical scientists commonly use the type of reasoning named [[abductive reasoning|abduction]]<ref name="Signature"/>, inference to the best explanation and argument from analogy.<ref name="LENNOX">{{cite book

| quote= Gould ... emphasized that historical scientist tested their theories by evaluating their explanatory power.}}</ref> Historical scientists commonly use:

*the type of reasoning named ''[[abductive reasoning|abduction]]''<ref name="Signature"/>,  

*''inference to the best explanation'' and  

*''argument from analogy''.<ref name="LENNOX">{{cite book

|author=John C. Lennox

|author=John C. Lennox

|title=God's undertaker. Has science buried God?

|title=God's undertaker. Has science buried God?