Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
150 bytes added ,  14:50, October 29, 2012
→‎Need sources: spoilt ballots are another solution
Line 29: Line 29:  
::::Early voting infringes on the right not to vote.  For example, it subjects union workers to repeated harassment over a period of days or weeks until they vote.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:19, 28 October 2012 (EDT)
 
::::Early voting infringes on the right not to vote.  For example, it subjects union workers to repeated harassment over a period of days or weeks until they vote.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:19, 28 October 2012 (EDT)
 
:::::That is not a result of "early voting" but rather of the state laws that give political parties access to the list of people who vote early or absentee. In a jurisdiction that allow early voting and keeps the list secret, there is no possibility of organized follow through. The ''Wall Street Journal'' recently ran an article on corporations where management told their workers how to vote, including statements that if the wrong candidates won, they might have to shut the plant. So, harassment goes both ways. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 06:56, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
 
:::::That is not a result of "early voting" but rather of the state laws that give political parties access to the list of people who vote early or absentee. In a jurisdiction that allow early voting and keeps the list secret, there is no possibility of organized follow through. The ''Wall Street Journal'' recently ran an article on corporations where management told their workers how to vote, including statements that if the wrong candidates won, they might have to shut the plant. So, harassment goes both ways. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 06:56, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::::Plus, if a voter decides that they don't want to vote, he or she can always spoil the ballot.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 10:50, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,135

edits

Navigation menu