Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: + +
hurricane
:::::That is not a result of "early voting" but rather of the state laws that give political parties access to the list of people who vote early or absentee. In a jurisdiction that allow early voting and keeps the list secret, there is no possibility of organized follow through. The ''Wall Street Journal'' recently ran an article on corporations where management told their workers how to vote, including statements that if the wrong candidates won, they might have to shut the plant. So, harassment goes both ways. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 06:56, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
:::::That is not a result of "early voting" but rather of the state laws that give political parties access to the list of people who vote early or absentee. In a jurisdiction that allow early voting and keeps the list secret, there is no possibility of organized follow through. The ''Wall Street Journal'' recently ran an article on corporations where management told their workers how to vote, including statements that if the wrong candidates won, they might have to shut the plant. So, harassment goes both ways. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 06:56, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
:::::Plus, if a voter decides that they don't want to vote, he or she can always spoil the ballot. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 10:50, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
:::::Plus, if a voter decides that they don't want to vote, he or she can always spoil the ballot. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 10:50, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
What effect will [[Hurricane Sandy]] have on [[early voting]]? Will sway the result toward one candidate? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:53, 29 October 2012 (EDT)