Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site
Line 2: Line 2:  
:There's no voting.  It is done on the meritocratic basis, much like this site (Andy chooses).  If you have constructive suggestions or comments I am sure they are welcome and will be taken into account when the final decision is made.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 02:53, 25 December 2012 (EST)
 
:There's no voting.  It is done on the meritocratic basis, much like this site (Andy chooses).  If you have constructive suggestions or comments I am sure they are welcome and will be taken into account when the final decision is made.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 02:53, 25 December 2012 (EST)
    +
I find it troubling that some of the nominees are sufficiently prominent to make the list, but do not have a separate article in CP.  Let's get to work. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 06:06, 25 December 2012 (EST)
   −
I find it troubling that some of the nominees are sufficiently prominent to make the list, but do not have a separate article in CP.  Let's get to work. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 06:06, 25 December 2012 (EST)
+
:DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but '''''logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site'''''.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,214

edits

Navigation menu