Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
240 bytes added ,  15:33, December 28, 2012
Line 30: Line 30:     
"American taxpayers are shelling out a staggering total of $1,591,200 annually for the First Lady’s 22 member personal staff." Why "staggering"? It's roughly in line with the amounts spent for the staffs of other recent First Ladies. [[User:BryanF|BryanF]] 08:45, 28 December 2012 (EST)
 
"American taxpayers are shelling out a staggering total of $1,591,200 annually for the First Lady’s 22 member personal staff." Why "staggering"? It's roughly in line with the amounts spent for the staffs of other recent First Ladies. [[User:BryanF|BryanF]] 08:45, 28 December 2012 (EST)
−
:Did most of the other First Ladies inveigle against "Whitey"?  Were they proud of their country "Finally"?  Or had they always been proud of their country?
+
:Did most of the other First Ladies inveigle against "Whitey"?  Were they proud of their country "Finally"?  Or had they always been proud of their country? [[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 10:11, 28 December 2012 (EST)
−
[[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 10:11, 28 December 2012 (EST)
+
::Hi, Dan! I'd be happy to buy you a dictionary so you could learn the meaning of the word "relevant". As a bonus, you could find out that "inveigle" is not a word at all. Good day, now! [[User:BryanF|BryanF]] 10:33, 28 December 2012 (EST)
SkipCaptcha
597

edits

Navigation menu