79
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 80:
Line 80: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Essay:A Refutation of the 15 Questions (view source)
Revision as of 16:40, January 4, 2013
, 16:40, January 4, 2013no edit summary
If over 99% of all species that have ever existed are no longer alive, their design was imperfect. How do ID proponents explain this?
If over 99% of all species that have ever existed are no longer alive, their design was imperfect. How do ID proponents explain this?
If blind chemistry did not create mind/intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality, are these characteristics not chemical or physical in nature? If so, what distinguishes them, and why hasn't it been detected?
Who designed the designer?
In what way is intelligent design a useful scientific theory, if one cannot predict the actions of the designer?
How does intelligent design pass the criterion of [[Occam's Razor]], if it assumes the existence of a designer?
What is the "signature" of intelligent design that ID proponents often refer to?
What experiments have shown intelligent design to be correct (as opposed to simply proving evolution wrong)?
If intelligent design should be taught in schools, why not other religious beliefs? See [[Flying Spaghetti Monster]]
In what way is intelligent design a logical process? How were living beings designed?