Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
972 bytes added ,  18:14, January 11, 2013
no edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:  
*When the [[Republican]] [[Majority Leader]] [[Trent Lott]] made a remark with racial implications, he was forced to resign; but when the [[Democratic]] Majority Leader [[Harry Reid]] made a far more offensive racial remark, liberals defended his remaining in power.
 
*When the [[Republican]] [[Majority Leader]] [[Trent Lott]] made a remark with racial implications, he was forced to resign; but when the [[Democratic]] Majority Leader [[Harry Reid]] made a far more offensive racial remark, liberals defended his remaining in power.
   −
*Wealth by a liberal, such as the tens of millions of dollars made by [[Al Gore]] and [[Bill Clinton]], is just fine; but wealth by a [[Christian]] preacher is somehow unacceptable.
+
*Wealth by a liberal, such as the tens of millions of dollars made by [[Al Gore]], [[John Kerry]], and [[Bill Clinton]], is just fine; but wealth by a [[Christian]] preacher or Republican politician such as [[Mitt Romney]] is somehow unacceptable.
    
*[[Global warming]]: Supporters of the [[Kyoto Protocol]] (an emissions reduction treaty) say that "[[correlation is not causation]]" when scientists point out the dozens of natural [[climate cycles]] linking changes in sunspots to changes in Earth's air temperature. But their argument for a [[runaway greenhouse effect]] is based on a single period from 1850 to present in which carbon dioxide levels and air temperatures have risen together.
 
*[[Global warming]]: Supporters of the [[Kyoto Protocol]] (an emissions reduction treaty) say that "[[correlation is not causation]]" when scientists point out the dozens of natural [[climate cycles]] linking changes in sunspots to changes in Earth's air temperature. But their argument for a [[runaway greenhouse effect]] is based on a single period from 1850 to present in which carbon dioxide levels and air temperatures have risen together.
Line 32: Line 32:  
*Liberals supported and participated in a prayer for the late [[Ted Kennedy]] led by the chaplain for the House of Representatives, which expressly and repeatedly referenced the [[Lord]], yet the same liberals insist on the [[censorship]] of [[classroom prayer]].<ref>http://www.necn.com/Boston/Politics/2009/08/29/Prayer-offered-for-Kennedy-at/1251586062.html</ref>
 
*Liberals supported and participated in a prayer for the late [[Ted Kennedy]] led by the chaplain for the House of Representatives, which expressly and repeatedly referenced the [[Lord]], yet the same liberals insist on the [[censorship]] of [[classroom prayer]].<ref>http://www.necn.com/Boston/Politics/2009/08/29/Prayer-offered-for-Kennedy-at/1251586062.html</ref>
   −
*The [[lamestream media]] are just fine with [[Hillary Clinton]] meeting "with a group investigating the disappearance of [[America]]n aviator [[Amelia Earhart]]."<ref>http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0320/Hillary-Clinton-wades-into-mystery-of-Amelia-Earhart</ref>  ''If a [[Republican]] [[Secretary of State]] did that, then he'd be called a "conspiracy theorist"!''
+
*The [[lamestream media]] are just fine with [[Hillary Clinton]] meeting "with a group investigating the disappearance of [[America]]n aviator [[Amelia Earhart]]."<ref>http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0320/Hillary-Clinton-wades-into-mystery-of-Amelia-Earhart</ref>  ''If a [[Republican]] [[Secretary of State]] did that, then they'd be called a "conspiracy theorist"!''
 +
 
 +
*Liberals blame conservatives for [[SOPA]] even though it came out of ''[[Hollywood]]''. Attack [[Lamar Smith]] almost exclusively for it, even though Republican Hollywood supporters are an abnormality, and give [[Patrick Leahy]], [[Al Franken]], and [[Chris Dodd]] a pass for advocating the same thing because they're Democrats.
 +
 
 +
*Democrats running primaries kicking party members like [[Joe Lieberman]] out of their party for disagreeing with them on an issue and having disdain for the now nonexistent 'Blue Dogs' and "centrist" Democrats, and yet constantly lecturing Republicans on how they should tolerate any amount of liberalism in their party up to and including voting with the Democrats on any issue and endorsing them for President. Indeed, if Republicans are unsatisfied with even the most severe [[RINO]]s, they're "intolerant" "purists" and the Democrats claim to have the higher ground.
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
343

edits

Navigation menu