| Line 73: |
Line 73: |
| | |Multiple | | |Multiple |
| | |Similarly, will atheist nations underachieve in general? | | |Similarly, will atheist nations underachieve in general? |
| − | |China, an officially atheist and communist country, led in gold medals in the first week but then dropped badly to a distant second place behind the United States, despite China having more than three times the population of the United States and despite having a national program designed to produce champion athletes. Increasingly atheistic Australia performed much worse than expectations. Australia has 35 medals, but only 7 gold medals. France has 34 medals, of which 11 are gold. In 2008, Australia won 46 medals and France won 41. Australia won 14 golds that year, a total that they failed to surpass. "Atheistic" Great Britain, on the other hand, had its best Olympic showing since the 1908 Olympic Games (where Team GB had over half of the athletes in competition), although this is possibly because they were the hosts (as they were in 1908). Even excluding Britain (which may or may not be accurate), the data is inconclusive as there is a 1/4 chance (25%) that two randomly selected countries would underperform by pure chance. 2016 will provide additional data to analyze, and it may be possible to reach a conclusion. Furthermore, any analysis including Great Britain in these Games is problematic, because hosts typically experience about a 30% medal boost. | + | |China, an officially atheist and communist country, led in gold medals in the first week but then dropped badly to a distant second place behind the United States, despite China having more than three times the population of the United States and despite having a national program designed to produce champion athletes. Increasingly atheistic Australia performed much worse than expectations. Australia won 35 medals, but only 7 gold medals. France has 34 medals, of which 11 are gold. In 2008, Australia won 46 medals and France won 41. Australia won 14 golds that year, a total that they failed to surpass. "Atheistic" Great Britain, on the other hand, had its best Olympic showing since the 1908 Olympic Games (where Team GB had over half of the athletes in competition), although this is possibly because they were the hosts (as they were in 1908 and 1948). Even excluding Britain (which may or may not be accurate), the data is inconclusive as there is a 1/4 chance (25%) that two randomly selected countries would underperform by pure chance. 2016 will provide additional data to analyze, and it may be possible to reach a conclusion. Furthermore, any analysis including Great Britain in these Games is problematic, because hosts typically experience about a 30% medal boost. |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |wrestling | | |wrestling |
| Line 93: |
Line 93: |
| | |[[Joke sports]] | | |[[Joke sports]] |
| | |Will underperforming countries pad their medal totals by excelling in many varieties of [[swimming]] and in non-serious sports like [[badminton]] and [[dressage]]? | | |Will underperforming countries pad their medal totals by excelling in many varieties of [[swimming]] and in non-serious sports like [[badminton]] and [[dressage]]? |
| − | |Several nations were able to obscure their underachievement in real sports and pad their medal totals by winning [[joke sport]] events of dubious value, such as table tennis (atheistic China won all 4 gold medals),<ref>http://espn.go.com/olympics/summer/2012/tabletennis/story/_/id/8247325/2012-summer-olympics-china-sweeps-all-four-table-tennis-gold-medals</ref> swimming relays (there is no baton passed in a swimming relay), equestrian (Great Britain racked up five medals in this), [add more] | + | |Several nations were able to obscure their underachievement in real sports and pad their medal totals by winning [[joke sport]] events of dubious value, such as table tennis (atheistic China won all 4 gold medals),<ref>http://espn.go.com/olympics/summer/2012/tabletennis/story/_/id/8247325/2012-summer-olympics-china-sweeps-all-four-table-tennis-gold-medals</ref> swimming relays (there is no baton passed in a swimming relay), equestrian (Great Britain racked up five medals in this), [add more], synchronized swimming (China won two of the six medals awarded), and synchronized diving (where China won all four gold medals). |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |men's tennis | | |men's tennis |
| Line 105: |
Line 105: |
| | |Gun events | | |Gun events |
| | |Will the [[lamestream media]] downplay the gun events because they want to continue to push [[gun control]]? | | |Will the [[lamestream media]] downplay the gun events because they want to continue to push [[gun control]]? |
| − | |Great Britain shooter Peter Wilson's gold medal success in the double-trap clay pigeon event was widely reported and celebrated in the British media, despite Britain being strong in favor of gun control. The victory of South Korean air pistol shooter Jin in winning the first gold medal of the games was reported in most GB media. Coverage is similar to other sports with modest national following. See the entry above on the Malaysian shooter for an exception to this lack of coverage. | + | |Great Britain shooter Peter Wilson's gold medal success in the double-trap clay pigeon event was widely reported and celebrated in the British media, despite Britain being strong in favor of gun control. The victory of Chinese air rifle shooter Yi Siling in winning the first gold medal of the games was reported in most GB media.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/jul/28/olympics-first-gold-medal-china</ref> Coverage is similar to other sports with modest national following. See the entry above on the Malaysian shooter for an exception to this lack of coverage. |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |Openly [[homosexual]] athletes | | |Openly [[homosexual]] athletes |
| | |Will the [[liberal media]] overpromote [[homosexual]] athletes, far beyond their achievements? | | |Will the [[liberal media]] overpromote [[homosexual]] athletes, far beyond their achievements? |
| − | |Several months before the games, ''Sports Illustrated'' ran a feature article entitled "The Transgender Athlete", which included significant overage of a transgender female-to-male shotputter attempting to qualify for the United States women's Olympic team. However, she failed to qualify at the US Olympic Trials, and as such has not received coverage during the actual Olympics. | + | |Several months before the games, ''Sports Illustrated'' ran a feature article entitled "The Transgender Athlete", which included significant overage of a transgender female-to-male shotputter attempting to qualify for the United States women's Olympic team. However, she failed to qualify at the US Olympic Trials, and as such did not receive any coverage during the actual Olympics. |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |Multiple | | |Multiple |