Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words (view source)

Revision as of 15:48, January 31, 2013

377 bytes added ,  15:48, January 31, 2013
→‎Proposed changes: "quackery" is namecalling that conservatives rarely use. It is a smear word that has no place in this quality list.
Line 549: Line 549:     
I'd also like clarification on how to know whether a stem word should be used in place of its root. For example, the entry "scapegoating" is based on the 1943 adjective version of the noun "scapegoat", which is from the 1500s - why?
 
I'd also like clarification on how to know whether a stem word should be used in place of its root. For example, the entry "scapegoating" is based on the 1943 adjective version of the noun "scapegoat", which is from the 1500s - why?
 +
 +
:Disputes at the margin are to be expected in a list like this.  You've identified two questionable entries, but their inclusion is adequately explained in the comment section.  Your third word, "quackery", is namecalling that conservatives rarely use.  It is a smear word that has no place in this quality list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:48, 31 January 2013 (EST)
    
== Conservative Words hypothesis is errant ==
 
== Conservative Words hypothesis is errant ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,219

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1032319"

Navigation menu