Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Proposed changes: when a word goes to a level higher than the root (as "scapegoating" does), then its new date and usage are more relevant.
Line 551: Line 551:     
:Disputes at the margin are to be expected in a list like this.  You've identified two questionable entries, but their inclusion is adequately explained in the comment section.  Your third word, "quackery", is namecalling that conservatives rarely use.  It is a smear word that has no place in this quality list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:48, 31 January 2013 (EST)
 
:Disputes at the margin are to be expected in a list like this.  You've identified two questionable entries, but their inclusion is adequately explained in the comment section.  Your third word, "quackery", is namecalling that conservatives rarely use.  It is a smear word that has no place in this quality list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:48, 31 January 2013 (EST)
 +
 +
:As to your second issue, when a word goes to a level higher than the root (as "scapegoating" does), then its new date and usage are more relevant.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:50, 31 January 2013 (EST)
    
== Conservative Words hypothesis is errant ==
 
== Conservative Words hypothesis is errant ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,219

edits

Navigation menu