| Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | :How would that answer to that question effect Allende's ability to survive the 1973 coup? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:22, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | | :How would that answer to that question effect Allende's ability to survive the 1973 coup? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:22, 20 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | == Fact: Allende was not brutal. Pinochet was. ==
| |
| | | | |
| − | I'm not talking here about Allende's ability to survive the coup and to that effect, I've moved this to a separate section.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Now please answer my earlier question. Does the fact that Pinochet tortured, maimed, and killed thousands of men, women and children for opposing him while Allende did not torture, maim and kill those who opposed him matter to you? Do you really consider human rights beside the point? Is torture and murder bad when leftists do it, but forgiveable when a free-market conservative like Pinochet does it? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 13:27, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :You still haven't answered the question. Did Allende agree to abide by co-operative security agreements within the alliance, or was Allende, like Castro, courting Soviet military co-operation? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:44, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I don't know. How is whether Allende agreed to this or not relevant to the fact that Allende did not torture, maim and murder his opponents and Pinochet did? And please answer my question. Does the fact that Pinochet tortured, maimed, and killed thousands of men, women and children for opposing him while Allende did not torture, maim and kill those who opposed him matter to you? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 13:46, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| | ==Background== | | ==Background== |
| Line 207: |
Line 199: |
| | ==Protection== | | ==Protection== |
| | This page is now protected from trolling. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salvador_Allende&diff=102666&oldid=102658] [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:23, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | | This page is now protected from trolling. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salvador_Allende&diff=102666&oldid=102658] [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:23, 12 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Fact: Allende was not brutal. Pinochet was. == |
| | + | |
| | + | I'm not talking here about Allende's ability to survive the coup and to that effect, I've moved this to a separate section. |
| | + | |
| | + | Now please answer my earlier question. Does the fact that Pinochet tortured, maimed, and killed thousands of men, women and children for opposing him while Allende did not torture, maim and kill those who opposed him matter to you? Do you really consider human rights beside the point? Is torture and murder bad when leftists do it, but forgiveable when a free-market conservative like Pinochet does it? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 13:27, 20 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | :You still haven't answered the question. Did Allende agree to abide by co-operative security agreements within the alliance, or was Allende, like Castro, courting Soviet military co-operation? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:44, 20 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | I don't know. How is whether Allende agreed to this or not relevant to the fact that Allende did not torture, maim and murder his opponents and Pinochet did? And please answer my question. Does the fact that Pinochet tortured, maimed, and killed thousands of men, women and children for opposing him while Allende did not torture, maim and kill those who opposed him matter to you? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 13:46, 20 March 2007 (EDT) |