1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 81:
Line 81: + + + + +
Talk:Irreducible complexity (view source)
Revision as of 15:29, March 28, 2013
, 15:29, March 28, 2013no edit summary
:::::::The creationists often fail to cite the fact that Darwin thought that the eye could develop in graduations and merely cite the first part of the quote which I do not think should be done. However, [[Charles Darwin]] even late in life often had overwhelming thoughts that the natural world was designed and you can read about this in the Conservapedia [[Charles Darwin]] article. So this material about Darwin and peacock feathers does not surprise me (Darwin wrote this when he was about 50 years old): http://idintheuk.blogspot.com/2006/06/peacock-feather.html [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 22:21, 24 December 2008 (EST)
:::::::The creationists often fail to cite the fact that Darwin thought that the eye could develop in graduations and merely cite the first part of the quote which I do not think should be done. However, [[Charles Darwin]] even late in life often had overwhelming thoughts that the natural world was designed and you can read about this in the Conservapedia [[Charles Darwin]] article. So this material about Darwin and peacock feathers does not surprise me (Darwin wrote this when he was about 50 years old): http://idintheuk.blogspot.com/2006/06/peacock-feather.html [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 22:21, 24 December 2008 (EST)
:::::::: These are excellent and interesting sources. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 00:26, 25 December 2008 (EST)
:::::::: These are excellent and interesting sources. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 00:26, 25 December 2008 (EST)
== Fallible Argument ==
I believe that the majority of the examples that Michael Behe's proposed that 'proved' irreducible complexity have now been succinctly refuted via the processes of exaptation, preadaptation, and cooptation. A simple Google search of any term should give you swathes of information as to how they work and how they go in disproving the irreducible complexity argument.
--[[User:SteelSaurus|SteelSaurus]] 11:29, 28 March 2013 (EDT)