Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 86:
Line 86: + +
Talk:Irreducible complexity (view source)
Revision as of 16:53, March 28, 2013
, 16:53, March 28, 2013to S. Saurus
I believe that the majority of the examples that Michael Behe's proposed that 'proved' irreducible complexity have now been succinctly refuted via the processes of exaptation, preadaptation, and cooptation. A simple Google search of any term should give you swathes of information as to how they work and how they go in disproving the irreducible complexity argument.
I believe that the majority of the examples that Michael Behe's proposed that 'proved' irreducible complexity have now been succinctly refuted via the processes of exaptation, preadaptation, and cooptation. A simple Google search of any term should give you swathes of information as to how they work and how they go in disproving the irreducible complexity argument.
--[[User:SteelSaurus|SteelSaurus]] 11:29, 28 March 2013 (EDT)
--[[User:SteelSaurus|SteelSaurus]] 11:29, 28 March 2013 (EDT)
:And how is your personal belief helping us to improve the article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:53, 28 March 2013 (EDT)