SkipCaptcha
786
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
no edit summary
Didn't want to put this on the main content page since it's so preliminary, but I thought it was important to note. I have a BS in Physics, so I feel confident in saying it COULD be a big step one way or the other, but this is not my area of expertise so I don't feel confident expounding on its validity. It's being reported on a ton of sites, but I saw it on BBC first so here's the link. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22016504 also, I've read through the editing guidelines but I'm still new and trying to learn. Please let me know if I've done anything wrong so i can continue to learn. Thanks. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 12:26, 3 April 2013 (EDT)
{{simulsubmitted|user=TerryH|site user=Temlakos}}
{{simulsubmitted|user=TerryH|site user=Temlakos}}
Dark matter 'proof' called into doubt: http://space.newscientist.com/article/mg19125684.200-dark-matter-proof-called-into-doubt.html and http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-09/ns-dm090606.php [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:28, 23 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
Dark matter 'proof' called into doubt: http://space.newscientist.com/article/mg19125684.200-dark-matter-proof-called-into-doubt.html and http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-09/ns-dm090606.php [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:28, 23 April 2007 (EDT)conservative