SkipCaptcha
786
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 312:
Line 312: + + + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 04:35, April 8, 2013
, 04:35, April 8, 2013suggestion that example 27 RE: PSR B1913+16 be removed with data provided
::Touché! Your point is well taken. Though I doubt that taking such a daring and controversial stand would get 1.8 million page views. :-) [[User:JudyJ|JudyJ]] 22:36, 17 September 2012 (EDT)
::Touché! Your point is well taken. Though I doubt that taking such a daring and controversial stand would get 1.8 million page views. :-) [[User:JudyJ|JudyJ]] 22:36, 17 September 2012 (EDT)
== 27. RE:PSR B1913+16 ==
<blockquote>
Data from the PSR B1913+16 increasingly diverge from predictions of the General Theory of Relativity such that, despite a Nobel Prize in Physics being awarded for early work on this pulsar, no data at all have been released about it for over five years.
</blockquote>
I would like to suggest that this be removed as both points (1. lack of data and 2. divergence from relativistic predictions) were disproved by the publishing of [http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/722/2/1030/ this paper] in The Astrophysical Journal in 2010. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:35, 8 April 2013 (EDT)