SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,592
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 318:
Line 318: + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 02:42, April 9, 2013
, 02:42, April 9, 2013→27. RE:PSR B1913+16
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
I would like to suggest that this be removed as both points (1. lack of data and 2. divergence from relativistic predictions) were disproved by the publishing of [http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/722/2/1030/ this paper] in The Astrophysical Journal in 2010. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:35, 8 April 2013 (EDT)
I would like to suggest that this be removed as both points (1. lack of data and 2. divergence from relativistic predictions) were disproved by the publishing of [http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/722/2/1030/ this paper] in The Astrophysical Journal in 2010. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:35, 8 April 2013 (EDT)
==Force acting on a mass==
The example, "The logical problem of a force which is applied at a right angle to the velocity of a relativistic mass - does this act on the rest mass or the relativistic mass?" needs to be rephrased to be more clear. Are we talking about measuring the force applied to the object or the change in trajectory of the object? The force acts on the object, but the sentence is phrased as if there are two different objects. The force will cause the trajectory of the object to change, which can be measured in specified frames of reference. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 22:42, 8 April 2013 (EDT)