Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 50: Line 50:  
::: First of all, that's a very different claim than claiming that it is a natural right. Second that argument in any event has a multitude of problems including that it implies that we have rights to pretty much all weapons. I don't think anyone would try to argue that their is a natural human right to possess nuclear weapons. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::: First of all, that's a very different claim than claiming that it is a natural right. Second that argument in any event has a multitude of problems including that it implies that we have rights to pretty much all weapons. I don't think anyone would try to argue that their is a natural human right to possess nuclear weapons. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::::Oh, I was never claiming that we have a right to possess all weapons. We have a right to "Possess enough power to defend our life should the need arise." Thats a very vague statement, and its purposely vague, as so that we can interpret it to mean what we want it to mean when we need it.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 17:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::::Oh, I was never claiming that we have a right to possess all weapons. We have a right to "Possess enough power to defend our life should the need arise." Thats a very vague statement, and its purposely vague, as so that we can interpret it to mean what we want it to mean when we need it.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 17:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
I think that there shouldn't be guns older than the revolutionary war allowed in American because then there wouldn't be as many gun deaths.

Navigation menu