Changes

*'''Expansion of jets at greater than the speed of light''': Radio-astronomers have measured outward motions of structures (''jets'') within QSOs over several years. On some occasions these measurements suggested the jet components should be moving at 10 times the speed of light. There have been many weak arguments presented to counter this assertions which would become unnecessary if the ''intrinsic'' component in the redshift (see below) would be assumed instead of preserving the conventional distance-based redshift interpretation for quasars.   

*'''Expansion of jets at greater than the speed of light''': Radio-astronomers have measured outward motions of structures (''jets'') within QSOs over several years. On some occasions these measurements suggested the jet components should be moving at 10 times the speed of light. There have been many weak arguments presented to counter this assertions which would become unnecessary if the ''intrinsic'' component in the redshift (see below) would be assumed instead of preserving the conventional distance-based redshift interpretation for quasars.   

The alternative proposition is that not all redshifts value of quasars is given by ''cosmological'' redshift (i.e. related to distance) but there might be a substantial ''intrinsic'' component involved which cannot be explained by cosmological expansion, [[gravitation]]al or [[Doppler Effect]]s. It has been suggested that intrinsic redshift component is the result of the initial zero inertial-mass of newly created matter that has been ejected from the cores of active galactic nuclei. This would mean that quasars might not be really so far away, and thus [[Hubble Law]] does not apply onto quasars and we need to be careful in its application.{{#tag:ref|The Hubble Law still seems correct for the biggest and brightest [[galaxy|galaxies]] of [[Galaxy cluster|clusters]]<ref name="Quantized Quasars"/>|group=note}} This may indicate the serious flaw in the [[Big Bang]] paradigm<ref name="Quantized Quasars">{{cite web

The alternative proposition is that not all redshifts value of quasars is given by ''cosmological'' redshift (i.e. related to distance) but there might be a substantial ''intrinsic'' component involved which cannot be explained by [[expanding universe|cosmological expansion]], [[gravitation]]al or [[Doppler Effect]]s. It has been suggested that intrinsic redshift component is the result of the initial zero inertial-mass of newly created matter that has been ejected from the cores of active galactic nuclei. This would mean that quasars might not be really so far away, and thus [[Hubble Law]] does not apply onto quasars and we need to be careful in its application.{{#tag:ref|The Hubble Law still seems correct for the biggest and brightest [[galaxy|galaxies]] of [[Galaxy cluster|clusters]]<ref name="Quantized Quasars"/>|group=note}} This may indicate the serious flaw in the [[Big Bang]] paradigm<ref name="Quantized Quasars">{{cite web

|title=Quantized quasar redshifts in a creationist cosmology

|title=Quantized quasar redshifts in a creationist cosmology

|author=John Hartnett

|author=John Hartnett