8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
no edit summary
:Your edit summary doesn't back up what you're saying. Administration was fine with this edit for nearly two weeks. Why should you be the one to remove this information?--[[User:BobbyD|BobbyD]] 20:14, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
:Your edit summary doesn't back up what you're saying. Administration was fine with this edit for nearly two weeks. Why should you be the one to remove this information?--[[User:BobbyD|BobbyD]] 20:14, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
::I'm sure the only reason the Administration was fine with it was because it's a fairly obscure article and so the parody went unnoticed. Maybe you should wait longer than twenty minutes after opening an account before trying to be an Internet Tough Guy. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 20:16, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
::I'm sure the only reason the Administration was fine with it was because it's a fairly obscure article and so the parody went unnoticed. Maybe you should wait longer than twenty minutes after opening an account before trying to be an Internet Tough Guy. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 20:16, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
:::Sorry but I'm not being tough, just showing that this guy is overrated. I won't edit-war with you, but I share Conservapedia's opinion on this, and I'm confident that administration will revert your changes, as they hold the correct opinion on this.--[[User:BobbyD|BobbyD]] 20:29, 13 June 2013 (EDT)