Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 32: Line 32:  
|isbn=978-1-9365990-0-4
 
|isbn=978-1-9365990-0-4
 
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Rc4ikgAACAAJ&dq=The+Myth+Of+junk+DNA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cXYXUd_GAuTw4QSX_4GQAg&redir_esc=y
 
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Rc4ikgAACAAJ&dq=The+Myth+Of+junk+DNA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cXYXUd_GAuTw4QSX_4GQAg&redir_esc=y
−
|quote=The second form ... is a circular argument, because the conclusion is already stated in premises.}}</ref> If a scientist made biased a priori assumptions, there is little point in asking what conclusions he derived.<ref name="DeniableDarwin">{{cite book
+
|quote=The second form ... is a circular argument, because the conclusion is already stated in premises.}}</ref> If scientists had made biased a priori assumptions, there is little point in asking what conclusions they have derived.<ref name="DeniableDarwin">{{cite book
 
|author=David Berlinski
 
|author=David Berlinski
 
|title=The Deniable Darwin
 
|title=The Deniable Darwin
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947

edits

Navigation menu