Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + + + + +
→Notable examples: adding Feynman on Schroedinger's equation
==Notable examples==
==Notable examples==
*The late world famous philosopher [[Antony Flew]] claimed that his departure from [[atheism]] was caused by consequent adherence to this principle.<ref name="Flew">{{Cite book|title=There is a God, How the world's most notorious atheist changed his mind|author=Antony Flew|publisher=HarperOne|year=2008|isbn=978-0-06-133530-3|pages=22, 42, 75, 89|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=zbL66ePcjpQC&dq=Antony+Flew+There+is+a+God&source=bl&ots=o0jEX-bGMl&sig=Rrf5Tv5MynLGVHFOhZy95LFfLGw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Zfx_UI7sNLDY4QSLi4HAAQ&redir_esc=y|quote=he was obeying the the command that the Plato in the Republic attributes to Socrates: "We must follow the argument wherever it leads." ...This Socratic principle also formed the inspiration of Socratic Club, a group that was really at the center of what intellectual life there was in wartime Oxford. ...C.S. Lewis's Socratic Club was open for business during the heyday of the new philosophy, and the Socratic principle I saw exemplified there...This statement represents a major change of course for me, but it was nevertheless consistent with principle I have embraced since the beginning of my philosophical life - of following the argument no matter where it leads...When I finally came to recognize the existence of a God, it was not a paradigm shift, because my paradigm remains, as Plato in his Republic scripted his Socrates to insist: "We must follow the argument wherever it leads."}}</ref>
*The late world famous philosopher [[Antony Flew]] claimed that his departure from [[atheism]] was caused by consequent adherence to this principle.<ref name="Flew">{{Cite book|title=There is a God, How the world's most notorious atheist changed his mind|author=Antony Flew|publisher=HarperOne|year=2008|isbn=978-0-06-133530-3|pages=22, 42, 75, 89|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=zbL66ePcjpQC&dq=Antony+Flew+There+is+a+God&source=bl&ots=o0jEX-bGMl&sig=Rrf5Tv5MynLGVHFOhZy95LFfLGw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Zfx_UI7sNLDY4QSLi4HAAQ&redir_esc=y|quote=he was obeying the the command that the Plato in the Republic attributes to Socrates: "We must follow the argument wherever it leads." ...This Socratic principle also formed the inspiration of Socratic Club, a group that was really at the center of what intellectual life there was in wartime Oxford. ...C.S. Lewis's Socratic Club was open for business during the heyday of the new philosophy, and the Socratic principle I saw exemplified there...This statement represents a major change of course for me, but it was nevertheless consistent with principle I have embraced since the beginning of my philosophical life - of following the argument no matter where it leads...When I finally came to recognize the existence of a God, it was not a paradigm shift, because my paradigm remains, as Plato in his Republic scripted his Socrates to insist: "We must follow the argument wherever it leads."}}</ref>
*cf. ''"Today we cannot see whether [[Schroedinger equation]] contains frogs, musical composers, or [[morality]] - or whether it does not. We cannot say whether something beyond it like [[God]] is needed, or not. And so we can all hold strong opinions either way."'' [[Feynman]]<ref>{{cite book
|author=Feynman
|title=The Flow of Wet Water, The Feynman Lectures on Physics
|chapter=41
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=uaQfAQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Flow+of+Wet+Water,+The+Feynman+Lectures+on+Physics&hl=en&sa=X&ei=DRT1UuGABOf8ywOT-4KACQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=frogs&f=false}}</ref>
*[[Edwin Hubble]] was criticised by [[John Hartnett]] for being biased<ref name="Hubble Bubble">{{cite book |title=Hubble Bubble: Big Bang in Trouble|author=John Hartnett|publisher=Creation Book Publishers|year=2010|pages=|format=DVD|url=http://www.amazon.com/Hubble-Bubble-Big-Bang-Trouble/dp/0949906387|quote=}}</ref> (thus effectively violating the Socratic principle) in his following type of statements in the paper ''The Observational Approach To Cosmology''<ref name="Observational Approach">{{cite web
*[[Edwin Hubble]] was criticised by [[John Hartnett]] for being biased<ref name="Hubble Bubble">{{cite book |title=Hubble Bubble: Big Bang in Trouble|author=John Hartnett|publisher=Creation Book Publishers|year=2010|pages=|format=DVD|url=http://www.amazon.com/Hubble-Bubble-Big-Bang-Trouble/dp/0949906387|quote=}}</ref> (thus effectively violating the Socratic principle) in his following type of statements in the paper ''The Observational Approach To Cosmology''<ref name="Observational Approach">{{cite web
|title=The Observational Approach to Cosmology
|title=The Observational Approach to Cosmology