Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 243:
Line 243: + + + + + +
→You contradicted yourself: new section
::Yes, he let reporters "examine" them, and they proclaimed them to be "genuine", but Obama never expected them to be subject to forensic examination by a law enforcement agency, which proclaimed them to be a Photoshop forgery. To date, no one has been allowed to see the originals. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:02, 3 November 2013 (EST)
::Yes, he let reporters "examine" them, and they proclaimed them to be "genuine", but Obama never expected them to be subject to forensic examination by a law enforcement agency, which proclaimed them to be a Photoshop forgery. To date, no one has been allowed to see the originals. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:02, 3 November 2013 (EST)
:::I don't see any point in continuing to budget my limited time to educate people who believe in wild conspiracy theories against all reputable evidence. I shall go back to working on articles that can really make Conservapedia stand apart from everything else on the Internet, like my [[User:GregG/Mainstream media attacks on arbitration|Mainstream media attacks on arbitration]] article. I should also get through dismantling the AAJ's most recent diatribe against arbitration. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 08:34, 5 November 2013 (EST)
:::I don't see any point in continuing to budget my limited time to educate people who believe in wild conspiracy theories against all reputable evidence. I shall go back to working on articles that can really make Conservapedia stand apart from everything else on the Internet, like my [[User:GregG/Mainstream media attacks on arbitration|Mainstream media attacks on arbitration]] article. I should also get through dismantling the AAJ's most recent diatribe against arbitration. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 08:34, 5 November 2013 (EST)
== You contradicted yourself ==
GregG, you contradicted yourself. If the 15 questions for evolutionists were so stupid as you maintain, then why did you contact [[Kenneth Miller]] about them? Either you were being stupid or the questions are legitimate to raise. I know the latter is the case. Seems like you are being mighty contradictory in this matter! And I know the questions were important and relevant to the creation vs. evolution issue, because even Richard Dawkins' moderator at his website posted the 15 questions and said they were good/interesting questions (If memory serves and it may not, it was at Dawkins' old website). By the way, how is Kenneth Miller doing as far as satisfactorily answering the 15 questions for evolutionists? Have you heard back from him yet?
Just admit it, unquestioningly maintaining errant dogma is vastly inferior to well-designed penetrating questions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:35, 13 January 2014 (EST)