Changes

{{discrimlaw}}

{{discrimlaw}}

'''''Plessy v. Ferguson''''' was a case handed down in 1896 by the Supreme Court.  Homer Plessy, a man who did not consider himself "African American," but qualified as "black" under "1-drop rules," sued after being kicked out of a "whites only" car in a railroad.  After winning his suit at all levels, the Supreme Court handed Plessy a loss for himself, and for the rights of Americans everywhere.

'''''Plessy v. Ferguson''''' was a case handed down in [[1896]] by the [[Supreme Court]].  Homer Plessy, a man who did not consider himself "[[African American]]," but qualified as "black" under "1-drop rules," sued after being kicked out of a "whites only" car in a [[railroad]].  After winning his suit at all levels, the [[Supreme Court]] handed Plessy a loss for himself, and for the [[unalienable rights]] of Americans everywhere.

The holding of ''Plessy'' made clear that the equality guarantees of the newly passed [[Fourteenth Amendment]] were confined to rights of a civil and political nature.  Social rights - such as equality in the public sphere - were not guaranteed.  Specifically, ''Plessy'' held that the federal government, or state governments, may classify on the basis of race and perform [[social engineering]] activities designed to separate the races so long as they did not become inordinately oppressive.  The majority of the Court did not define what ''would'' be inordinately oppressive.

The holding of ''Plessy'' made clear that the equality guarantees of the newly passed [[Fourteenth Amendment]] were confined to rights of a civil and political nature.  Social rights - such as equality in the public sphere - were not guaranteed.  Specifically, ''Plessy'' held that the [[federal government]], or [[state government]]s, may classify on the basis of [[race]] and perform [[social engineering]] activities designed to separate the races so long as they did not become inordinately [[oppressive]].  The majority of the Court did not define what ''would'' be inordinately oppressive.

Justice Harlan filed a blistering dissent, arguing for a color-blind constitution, and stating that he would have stricken down segregation over 50 years before the Court did in ''[[Brown v. Board of Education]]''.

Justice [[John Marshall Harlan]] filed a blistering dissent, arguing for a color-blind constitution, and stating that he would have stricken down segregation over 50 years before the Court did in ''[[Brown v. Board of Education]]''.

==Text of the decision==

==Text of the decision==

[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]