Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + +
→Personal opinion of Andrew Schlafly
:August, this website exists to '''''advance''''' knowledge and insights, not simply to repeat less informed views of the past. The Vulgate was not even an English translation, and the [[KJV]] or [[NIV]] translations were not perfect. Accordingly, neither they (nor my name) belongs in the introduction here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:02, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
:August, this website exists to '''''advance''''' knowledge and insights, not simply to repeat less informed views of the past. The Vulgate was not even an English translation, and the [[KJV]] or [[NIV]] translations were not perfect. Accordingly, neither they (nor my name) belongs in the introduction here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:02, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
::[[KJV]], [[NIV]] are not perfect. That's true. But are you? At this moment, you own this phrase. No one else shares your insight - I, the only other editor on this page with some Greek and interest in the CBP, states that your translation is wrong. Yet you claim that this clumsy phrase "the Son, a human being" is the most accurate translation. And you want to do so under the cloak of anonymity! No Sir, a reader of the text should be able to realize that this is ''your'' personal, not traditional wisdom. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:25, 24 June 2014 (EDT)