Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
541 bytes added ,  19:47, June 24, 2014
→‎Personal opinion of Andrew Schlafly: Some translations use a capital "m" for man, while others use a small "m", which shows the phrase is an erroneous one in English.
Line 56: Line 56:     
::::"Could you please provide us with a list of genitives translated as appositions in the way you would like to see this in this case?" As I said before, Gospel of John was probably translated from Aramaic. It is not unlikely therefore that certain phrases in the Greek version are somewhat odd by the standards of that language. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 15:24, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
 
::::"Could you please provide us with a list of genitives translated as appositions in the way you would like to see this in this case?" As I said before, Gospel of John was probably translated from Aramaic. It is not unlikely therefore that certain phrases in the Greek version are somewhat odd by the standards of that language. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 15:24, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::August, here is a list of other translation errors in the [[KJV]]: [http://thetencommandmentsministry.us/ministry/free_bible/kjv_translation_errors]  Are you going to claim that nothing on that list is correct?
 +
 +
::::You ask lots of questions, but I don't recalling seeing you answer the basic issue:  "the Son of Man" is meaningless in English.  Some translations use a capital "m" for man, while others use a small "m", which shows the phrase is an erroneous one in English.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:47, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits

Navigation menu