Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 145:
Line 145: − ::Thanks for the reply! I think I've managed to correct all instances of the term in Gospel of John (if there's something I missed than somebody please let me know), Soon I'll begin working on the removing the term from our translation of Gospel of Mark. Should the use of the phrase "Son of Man" be corrected when translating only the New Testament, or also when translating the Old Testament? - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 11:28, 30 June 2014 (EDT) EDIT: I've finished correcting the usage of the term in Gospels of John, Mark and Matthew. After I'll rest a bit, a correction of our translation of Gospel of Luke will also follow. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 12:01, 30 June 2014 (EDT) − + − + − + − + − + + + + +
→ὁ υἱὸς τοὺ ἀνθρώπου in the rest of the CBP: Does Conservapedia endorse censorship? I don't think so....
:I think it should be "the Son, a human being," unless the context indicates otherwise. It would be great if you could update the other instances of "Son of Man."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:01, 29 June 2014 (EDT)
:I think it should be "the Son, a human being," unless the context indicates otherwise. It would be great if you could update the other instances of "Son of Man."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:01, 29 June 2014 (EDT)
:::PetyrB, thanks, but the translation is "the Son, a human being," not "the Son of God, a human being." The latter would have been blasphemous, which was then a very serious crime.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:11, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
::I advise against such a substitution, futilely, I suppose. But the only justification for this phrase is that Andy likes it, he hasn't come up with ''anything'' resembling a fact, an example for this use of the genitive, etc. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:27, 29 June 2014 (EDT)
::::Whoops... Should have taken better notice. My bad, within a couple of minutes I'll fix this. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 12:12, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
:::Thanks for the reply! I think I've managed to correct all instances of the term in Gospel of John (if there's something I missed than somebody please let me know), Soon I'll begin working on the removing the term from our translation of Gospel of Mark. Should the use of the phrase "Son of Man" be corrected when translating only the New Testament, or also when translating the Old Testament? - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 11:28, 30 June 2014 (EDT) EDIT: I've finished correcting the usage of the term in Gospels of John, Mark and Matthew. After I'll rest a bit, a correction of our translation of Gospel of Luke will also follow. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 12:01, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
:::::Fixed my mistake, after some rest I will start working on Gospel of Luke. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 12:24, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
::::PetyrB, thanks, but the translation is "the Son, a human being," not "the Son of God, a human being." The latter would have been blasphemous, which was then a very serious crime.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:11, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
::::::Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:39, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
:::::Whoops... Should have taken better notice. My bad, within a couple of minutes I'll fix this. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 12:12, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
:::::::No problem, glad to help. I went through the Gospels, Acts and Hebrews, if there's something I'm forgetting let me know. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 13:03, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
::::::Fixed my mistake, after some rest I will start working on Gospel of Luke. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 12:24, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
:::::::Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:39, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
::::::::No problem, glad to help. I went through the Gospels, Acts and Hebrews, if there's something I'm forgetting let me know. - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 13:03, 30 June 2014 (EDT)