Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 249:
Line 249: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
Just admit it, unquestioningly maintaining errant dogma is vastly inferior to well-designed penetrating questions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:35, 13 January 2014 (EST)
Just admit it, unquestioningly maintaining errant dogma is vastly inferior to well-designed penetrating questions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:35, 13 January 2014 (EST)
== For Your Information ==
(content originally posted by [[User:Conservative]] at [[User:Conservative/FYI]] and subject to Conservapedia's copyright policy)
<div style="margin: 10px; padding: 10px; background-color:#CCC">
JeevesMkII,
You wrote:
"...religion is still following the trajectory of a failing social network..."
The percentage of atheists in the world has significantly dropped since the 1970s. See: [[Global atheism]].
In the next 11 years, there is expected to be 300,000,000 more self-identified Christians in the world and 3,000,000 less atheists in the world.[http://www.gordonconwell.edu/resources/CSGC-Resources.cfm]
Will these global trends affect the Western World? Professor Eric Kaufmann, an agnostic who teaches at the Birbeck College, University of London, told a secular audience in Australia: "The trends that are happening worldwide inevitably in an age of globalization are going to affect us."[http://fora.tv/2010/09/05/Eric_Kaufmann_Shall_the_Religious_Inherit_the_Earth][http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/11/2013-continues-to-be-worst-year-in.html]
Next, you didn't show that the number of atheists in the USA is rising. Until you show that "Nones/no religion" people are actually atheists and not largely non-sectarian Christians/theists, I have no reason to believe your claim.[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/research-shows-american.html][http://www.pewforum.org/2012/10/09/nones-on-the-rise/]
Also, I hope you realize that your use of profanity (the F word) demonstrates that you are an uncouth individual and likely belonging to "low atheism"/"low church atheism".[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/12/illogical-atheist.html][http://www.voxday.net/mart/TIA_free.pdf] Even the atheist/agnostic flip-flopper [[Richard Dawkins]] does not use the F word in public and banned people in his forum for using profanity.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/7322177/Richard-Dawkins-in-bitter-web-censorship-row-with-fellow-atheists.html] See also: [http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/06/christianity-has-great-depth-and.html Christianity has great depth and sophistication. Also, 7 reasons why atheism has developed a reputation of being low-class and "low brow"] and [[Essay: Indian Christian culture is better than low class atheist "culture"]] Your uncouth language is not entirely surprising given that the head person at your website does not appear to care about his appearance/health and has an abundance of unsightly flab! See: [[Atheism and obesity]]
By the way, how long do you think you can continue to ignore reality? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:19, 21 April 2014 (EDT)
</div>
==CO2==
In response to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hybrid_electric_vehicle&diff=prev&oldid=1093414 this], there is certainly evidence which suggests that CO2 should viewed as plant food rather than pollution.[http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/30/memo-to-doubtersi-was-tempted-to-say-deniersco2-is-plant-food/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 05:46, 17 July 2014 (EDT)