27
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: + + + + + +
Debate:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist? (view source)
Revision as of 15:17, August 6, 2014
, 15:17, August 6, 2014Input
==Paradoxical==
==Paradoxical==
If we consider the idea that "everything" is included in the universe, does that then include the universe itself? It is the general paradox of Set Theory in mathematics: if we define something that includes everything, does it also include itself? It is the thing that has been defined, but is a separate entity BECAUSE of that definition; thereby by existing, defies it's own definition.
If we consider the idea that "everything" is included in the universe, does that then include the universe itself? It is the general paradox of Set Theory in mathematics: if we define something that includes everything, does it also include itself? It is the thing that has been defined, but is a separate entity BECAUSE of that definition; thereby by existing, defies it's own definition.
==Meaning of Universe==
A universe is a oneness by name, yet even in scientific sources, there are theories of other universes. I like the former paradoxical argument, in that what is meant by a universe? The physical? God isn't restricted to physical. Neither is science. There are parameters that are unable to be understood because of this universe perspective. So I disagree with the universe including everything...as first of all, we don't know what everything is, and second of all, we are in a sense in the centre looking out at an ever expanding space with lots of things in it (not just things...LOTS of things!!!)
[[User:Exwikipediaperson|Exwikipediaperson]] 11:17, 6 August 2014 (EDT)