: That I can understand. I just think it's important to separate issues of ''fact'' (Does this God exist as described?) from issues of preference (assuming this God exists, do I want anything to do with Him?). Your arguments so far have centered around whether or not he is a ''good'' God ... my question is, what reason do you have to believe that the book is factually and historically false? [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 20:26, 17 July 2007 (EDT) | : That I can understand. I just think it's important to separate issues of ''fact'' (Does this God exist as described?) from issues of preference (assuming this God exists, do I want anything to do with Him?). Your arguments so far have centered around whether or not he is a ''good'' God ... my question is, what reason do you have to believe that the book is factually and historically false? [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 20:26, 17 July 2007 (EDT) |