Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
cat
Line 53: Line 53:  
''I don't believe the God of the Bible is attractive. I do believe a guy named Jesus was around, and that he was crucified, and etc. Now whether or not it goes down like it says in the Bible exactly, I don't know.''
 
''I don't believe the God of the Bible is attractive. I do believe a guy named Jesus was around, and that he was crucified, and etc. Now whether or not it goes down like it says in the Bible exactly, I don't know.''
 
: That I can understand.  I just think it's important to separate issues of ''fact'' (Does this God exist as described?) from issues of preference (assuming this God exists, do I want anything to do with Him?).  Your arguments so far have centered around whether or not he is a ''good'' God ... my question is, what reason do you have to believe that the book is factually and historically false?  [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 20:26, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
 
: That I can understand.  I just think it's important to separate issues of ''fact'' (Does this God exist as described?) from issues of preference (assuming this God exists, do I want anything to do with Him?).  Your arguments so far have centered around whether or not he is a ''good'' God ... my question is, what reason do you have to believe that the book is factually and historically false?  [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 20:26, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
Block, SkipCaptcha
8,517

edits

Navigation menu