Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
58 bytes added ,  19:24, September 25, 2014
Line 43: Line 43:     
For example, the [[Oxford University]] atheist [[Daniel Came]] told the agnostic [[Richard Dawkins]]:   
 
For example, the [[Oxford University]] atheist [[Daniel Came]] told the agnostic [[Richard Dawkins]]:   
−
"The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God], ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', May 14, 2011</ref>  
+
"The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God], ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', May 14, 2011</ref> See also: [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates]]
    
Atheists/agnostics frequently do very poorly in debates (see: [[Atheism and debate]]).
 
Atheists/agnostics frequently do very poorly in debates (see: [[Atheism and debate]]).
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,956

edits

Navigation menu