Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
30 bytes added ,  19:25, September 25, 2014
Line 45: Line 45:  
"The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God], ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', May 14, 2011</ref> See also: [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates]]
 
"The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God], ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', May 14, 2011</ref> See also: [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates]]
   −
Atheists/agnostics frequently do very poorly in debates (see: [[Atheism and debate]]).
+
Atheists/agnostics frequently do very poorly in debates and rarely do well in debates (see: [[Atheism and debate]]).
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,956

edits

Navigation menu