Block, SkipCaptcha, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
5,655
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 111:
Line 111: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 12:53, January 20, 2007
, 12:53, January 20, 2007no edit summary
:If Conservapedia has 3,000 articles and grows at 70 articles per day, that means that it grows by 2.3% every day. I don't think it will really keep doing this, but let's suppose it did. My calculations show that 1.023<sup>31</sup>, that is 1.023 multiplied by itself thirty-one times, is 2.02. That means that the number of articles would double every month.
:If Conservapedia has 3,000 articles and grows at 70 articles per day, that means that it grows by 2.3% every day. I don't think it will really keep doing this, but let's suppose it did. My calculations show that 1.023<sup>31</sup>, that is 1.023 multiplied by itself thirty-one times, is 2.02. That means that the number of articles would double every month.
:'''If''' the number of articles in Conservapedia were to double every month, how long would it take to reach a million? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:55, 20 January 2007 (EST)
:'''If''' the number of articles in Conservapedia were to double every month, how long would it take to reach a million? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:55, 20 January 2007 (EST)
*I think that our focus should be not on the number of pages, but on the quality of the pages. The number of possible useful, high quality pages is finite. We do not need to have a million pages if half of them are going to be controversial or useless. It is much better to have less pages and maintain our high quality standards. [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 07:53, 20 January 2007 (EST)