1,185
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 113:
Line 113: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 16:05, January 20, 2007
, 16:05, January 20, 2007no edit summary
*I think that our focus should be not on the number of pages, but on the quality of the pages. The number of possible useful, high quality pages is finite. We do not need to have a million pages if half of them are going to be controversial or useless. It is much better to have less pages and maintain our high quality standards. [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 07:53, 20 January 2007 (EST)
*I think that our focus should be not on the number of pages, but on the quality of the pages. The number of possible useful, high quality pages is finite. We do not need to have a million pages if half of them are going to be controversial or useless. It is much better to have less pages and maintain our high quality standards. [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 07:53, 20 January 2007 (EST)
I agree with you Sharon, but disagree at the same time. We can make higher quality pages (which I have already seen us do), but lets make alot of them. Cant hurt us. It will only make us better. More pages, and higher quality. Thats what we should do. We have alot of pages (considering how long we have been around), but they are of a high quality. We need to keep doing this. On google if u punch in Online Encyclipideia, ours is not in the first 5 pages. We need to get more publicity. This is done by: 1. More terms and higher quality; 2. Sharing it with others. Thats all we can do for now. If there is anything else, add on to the list. [[Will N.]]