SkipCaptcha
12,693
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 13:
Line 13: − + Line 25:
Line 25: − + Line 31:
Line 31: − + Line 37:
Line 37: − + Line 55:
Line 55: − + Line 61:
Line 61: − + Line 67:
Line 67: − + Line 73:
Line 73: − + Line 91:
Line 91: − + Line 97:
Line 97: − + Line 103:
Line 103: − + Line 109:
Line 109: − + Line 115:
Line 115: − + Line 121:
Line 121: − + Line 127:
Line 127: − + Line 133:
Line 133: − + Line 139:
Line 139: − + Line 151:
Line 151: − + − + Line 162:
Line 162: − + Line 168:
Line 168: − + Line 184:
Line 184: − + Line 190:
Line 190: − + Line 196:
Line 196: − + Line 202:
Line 202: − + Line 220:
Line 220: − + Line 226:
Line 226: − + Line 238:
Line 238: − + Line 256:
Line 256: − + Line 262:
Line 262: − + Line 292:
Line 292: − + Line 298:
Line 298: − + Line 326:
Line 326: − + Line 332:
Line 332: − + Line 345:
Line 345: − + Line 357:
Line 357: − + Line 363:
Line 363: − + Line 369:
Line 369: − + Line 375:
Line 375: − + Line 405:
Line 405: − + Line 412:
Line 412: − + Line 486:
Line 486: − + Line 492:
Line 492: − + Line 498:
Line 498: − + Line 510:
Line 510: − + Line 549:
Line 549: − + Line 555:
Line 555: − + Line 561:
Line 561: − + Line 567:
Line 567: − + Line 573:
Line 573: − + Line 579:
Line 579: − + Line 585:
Line 585: − + Line 591:
Line 591: − + Line 597:
Line 597: − + Line 603:
Line 603: − + Line 609:
Line 609: − + Line 621:
Line 621: − + Line 649:
Line 649: − + Line 661:
Line 661: − + Line 673:
Line 673: − + Line 679:
Line 679: − + Line 697:
Line 697: − + Line 703:
Line 703: − + Line 715:
Line 715: − + Line 721:
Line 721: − + Line 731:
Line 731: − +
Essay:Worst Liberal Movies (view source)
Revision as of 00:07, October 22, 2014
, 00:07, October 22, 2014Added hyperlinks and Proof Read
|2012
|2012
|Not Rated
|Not Rated
|Liberal haters playing conservatives in a HBO movie about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain|McCain]] and Palin call it fiction.
|[[Liberal]] haters playing [[conservative]]s in a [[HBO]] movie about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain|McCain]] and Palin call it fiction.
|NA - TV
|NA - TV
|-
|-
|2008
|2008
|PG-13
|PG-13
|A movie designed to denigrate the role of Christianity in US politics and particularly in the life of [[George W. Bush]].
|A movie designed to denigrate the role of [[Christianity]] in U.S. [[politics] and particularly in the life of [[George W. Bush]].
|$25,534,493
|$25,534,493
|-
|-
|2004
|2004
|R
|R
|A Michael Moore movie, which distorts the tangential link between the Bush family and the Bin Laden family.
|A [[Michael Moore]] movie, which distorts the tangential link between the [[Bush]] family and the [[Bin Laden]] family.
|$119,194,771
|$119,194,771
|-
|-
|2004
|2004
|R
|R
|A fawning monument to communist [[Che Guevara]].
|A fawning monument to [[communist]] [[Che Guevara]].
|$16,781,387
|$16,781,387
|-
|-
|1995
|1995
|R
|R
|A senseless criticism of capital punishment, with an ending that left some liberal viewers even more confused.
|A senseless criticism of [[capital punishment]], with an ending that left some liberal viewers even more confused.
|$39,363,635
|$39,363,635
|-
|-
|2003
|2003
|R
|R
|Anti-American.
|[[Anti-American]].
|$16,680,836
|$16,680,836
|-
|-
|2003
|2003
|R
|R
|Anti-American sequel to Dogville. Star James Caan refused to be apart of this describing director Lars von Trier as Anti-American and stated that he himself is an "ultra-conservative".
|Anti-American sequel to Dogville. Star [[James Caan]] refused to be apart of this describing director Lars von Trier as Anti-American and stated that he himself is an "ultra-conservative".
|$674,918
|$674,918
|-
|-
|1969
|1969
|R
|R
|Liberal Propaganda that blames the military for liberal wrong doing.
|Liberal Propaganda that blames the [[military]] for liberal wrong doing.
|$14,283,305
|$14,283,305
|-
|-
|1972
|1972
|NR
|NR
|Jane Fonda "art film" directed by Jean-Luc Godard, whose notoriously anti-American and idolizes [[Karl Marx]], is nothing more then a propaganda film for Communism, as it sympathizes with the youths who partook in the May 1968 Communist uprisings in France and features blunt anti-American imagery.
|[[Jane Fonda]] "art film" directed by [[Jean-Luc Godard]], whose notoriously anti-American and idolizes [[Karl Marx]], is nothing more then a propaganda film for Communism, as it sympathizes with the youths who partook in the May 1968 Communist uprisings in [[France]] and features blunt anti-American imagery.
|
|
|-
|-
|2009
|2009
|PG-13
|PG-13
|A typical Michael Moore hatchet-job where he relentlessly attacks America's capitalist economy with claims of alleged financial inequality.
|A typical Michael Moore hatchet-job where he relentlessly attacks America's [[capitalist]] [[economy]] with claims of alleged financial inequality.
|$14,363,397
|$14,363,397
|-
|-
|1979
|1979
|PG
|PG
|The movie depicts a meltdown of a fictional nuclear power plant. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a nuclear meltdown and the resultant damage. This film along with the Three Mile Island incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release) are often credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America.
|The movie depicts a meltdown of a fictional [[nuclear power]] plant. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a [[nuclear accident]]/meltdown and the resultant damage. This film along with the [[Three Mile Island]] incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release) are often credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America.
|$51,718,367
|$51,718,367
|-
|-
|2007
|2007
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Another Michael Moore film which spread many falsehoods about American healthcare while unduly glorifying the so-called benefits of socialized healthcare. Memorably referred to Cuban healthcare as being better than American healthcare.
|Another Michael Moore film which spread many falsehoods about American [[healthcare]] while unduly glorifying the so-called benefits of [[socialized medicine]] such as now found in [[Obamacare]]. Memorably referred to [[Cuba]]n healthcare as being better than American healthcare.
|$24,540,079
|$24,540,079
|-
|-
|1979
|1979
|R
|R
|Overindulgent anti-war diatribe. Portrays US servicemen as corrupt, incompetent drug-users.
|Overindulgent anti-war diatribe. Portrays U.S. servicemen as corrupt, incompetent [[drug addiction|drug-users]].
|$78,784,010
|$78,784,010
|-
|-
|2010
|2010
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Another Bush bash flick starring communist Sean Penn. 2010 film rehashes the lead up to the war in Iraq and Valerie Plame's role. Typical un-American Hollywood film "The narrative that Karl Rove and Dick Cheney’s Chief of Staff Scooter Libby were nefarious behind-the-scenes players intent on destroying innocent reputations while pushing the nation into war on false pretenses."
|Another Bush bash flick starring [[communist]] [[Sean Penn]]. 2010 film rehashes the lead up to the [[Iraq War|war in Iraq]] and [[Valerie Plame]]'s role. Typical un-American Hollywood film "The narrative that [[Karl Rove]] and [[Dick Cheney]]'s Chief of Staff [[Scooter Libby]] were nefarious behind-the-scenes players intent on destroying innocent reputations while pushing the nation into war on false pretenses."
|$9,540,691
|$9,540,691
|-
|-
|2008
|2008
|Not Rated
|Not Rated
|The 2008 HBO movie on the 2000 Presidential elections and its aftermath in Florida. A look into how the Republicans stole the election and the role of its party members that made it happen. Republicans are portrayed as ghoulish and cited as manufacturing demonstrations. Both the real Warren Christopher and James Baker contend the film’s portrayal of the former is hopelessly untrue.
|The 2008 [[HBO]] movie on the [[2000 Presidential election]]s and its aftermath in [[Florida]]. A look into how the [[Republicans]] stole the [[election]] and the role of its party members that made it happen. Republicans are portrayed as ghoulish and cited as manufacturing demonstrations. Both the real [[Warren Christopher]] and [[James Baker]] contend the film's portrayal of the former is hopelessly untrue.
|NA - TV
|NA - TV
|-
|-
|2007
|2007
|R
|R
|Brian De Palma’s 2007 fictional anti-Iraq War film funded by Mark Cuban. The film is credited with inspiring a terrorist attack that killed two U.S. servicemen in Germany.
|Brian De Palma’s 2007 fictional anti-Iraq War film funded by Mark Cuban. The film is credited with inspiring a [[terrorist]] attack that killed two U.S. servicemen in [[Germany]].
|$65,388
|$65,388
|-
|-
|2000
|2000
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Had a plot which was based on the first capture of a German Enigma machine in World War 2. However, in the film the capture is made by Americans. In fact the first Enigma machine was captured by the British in 1941 prior to the Americans entering the war.
|Had a plot which was based on the first capture of a [[German]] [[Enigma machine]] in [[World War Two]]. However, in the film the capture is made by Americans. In fact the first Enigma machine was captured by the [[British]] in 1941 prior to the Americans entering the war.
|$77,122,415
|$77,122,415
|-
|-
|1998 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions'')
|1998 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions'')
|R
|R
|Glorifies anarchism and nihilism, as well as containing several hints towards a pro-communist, anti-American/anti-Christian view, despite the salvation narrative. In addition, the Architect scene is implied to have been done to give a "devastating critique/twist" to salvation myths (thus implying that the Architect was a malevolent allegory of the Christian God). Far-left race-baiting scholar Cornel West was also hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) felt his pro-Socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric.
|Glorifies anarchism and [[nihilism]], as well as containing several hints towards a pro-communist, anti-American/[[anti-Christian]] view, despite the salvation narrative. In addition, the Architect scene is implied to have been done to give a "devastating critique/twist" to salvation myths (thus implying that the Architect was a malevolent allegory of the Christian [[God]]). Far-[[leftist|left]] [[race-baiting]] scholar Cornel West was also hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) felt his pro-Socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric.
|-
|-
|''The Lone Ranger''
|''The Lone Ranger''
|2013
|2013
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Attacks capitalists and the military, portraying the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as 'thugs' who support their actions. Also distorts the messages of it's source material by displaying the Lone Ranger, shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV show and radio show, as dumb-founded and unintelligent, and instead featuring his sidekick Tonto (played by [[liberal]] pot-smoker [[Johnny Depp]] as not only the 'star' of the film, but as the Lone Ranger's voice of reason.
|Attacks [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]], portraying the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as 'thugs' who support their actions. Also distorts the messages of it's source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV show and radio show, as dumb-founded and unintelligent, and instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot]]-smoker [[Johnny Depp]] as not only the 'star' of the film, but as the Lone Ranger's voice of reason.
|-
|-
|-
|-
|2007
|2007
|R
|R
|Encourages the false idea that liberalism must be established in America
|Encourages the false idea that [[liberalism]] must be established in America
|
|
|-
|-
|1981
|1981
|R
|R
|The German Side of World War II, shown in a positive view, and is Anti-American.
|The German Side of [[World War II]], shown in a positive view, and is Anti-American.
|$11,487,676
|$11,487,676
|}
|}
|1999
|1999
|R
|R
|A disgusting celebration of obscenity.
|A disgusting celebration of [[obscenity]].
|$83,137,603
|$83,137,603
|-
|-
|1993
|1993
|R
|R
|Promotes promiscuity and drug abuse.
|Promotes [[promiscuity]] and [[drug abuse]].
|$7,993,039
|$7,993,039
|-
|-
|2014
|2014
|TV MA
|TV MA
|Another homosexual propaganda film that criticizes the [[Reagan Administration]] and general Conservative ideology. The GLBT community was a strong promoter of this film and insists its artful, when really it is decadent.
|Another [[homosexual agenda|homosexual propaganda]] film that criticizes the [[Reagan Administration]] and general Conservative ideology. The GLBT community was a strong promoter of this film and insists its artful, when really it is decadent.
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|-
|2010
|2010
|R
|R
|Film about homosexual poet, [[Allen Ginsberg]]. Promotes the homosexual agenda and the idea that writing about pornography is protected under the first amendment and has literary value.
|Film about homosexual poet, [[Allen Ginsberg]]. Promotes the homosexual agenda and the idea that writing about [[pornography]] is protected under the [[First Amendment]] and has literary value.
|
|
|-
|-
|2013
|2013
|R
|R
|Criticizes Big Business and supports illegal immigration.
|Criticizes Big Business and supports [[illegal immigration]].
|
|
|-
|-
|2009
|2009
|PG-13
|PG-13
|A movie with many destructive messages. The movie promotes environmentalism, claiming that nature is God, and feminism. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. The hero of the film also forms a rather creepy romance with the native princess, who is of another species, perhaps a symbol for bestiality.
|A movie with many destructive messages. The movie promotes [[environmentalism]], claiming that nature is God, and [[feminism]]. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. The hero of the film also forms a rather creepy romance with the native princess, who is of another species, perhaps a symbol for bestiality.
|$760,507,625
|$760,507,625
|-
|-
|2008
|2008
|R
|R
|Shows drug abuse to be "cool".
|Shows [[drug abuse]] to be "cool".
|$87,341,380
|$87,341,380
|-
|-
|1963
|1963
|Not Rated
|Not Rated
|Italian film that promotes unions. The movie also promotes infidelity.
|Italian film that promotes [[trade union]]s. The movie also promotes [[infidelity]].
|Unknown
|Unknown
|-
|-
|2013
|2013
|R
|R
|Egregiously supports the Homosexual agenda
|Egregiously supports the homosexual agenda
|
|
|-
|-
|2010
|2010
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Glorifies the gossip website [[Facebook]], which feeds narcissism and destroys marriages. Also portrays drug use and misogyny in a positive light.
|Glorifies the [[gossip]] website [[Facebook]], which feeds [[narcissism]] and destroys marriages. Also portrays drug use and [[misogyny]] in a positive light.
|$96,962,694
|$96,962,694
|-
|-
|2007
|2007
|PG
|PG
|Poor morals shown, encourages bad behavior, such as smoking, drinking, cursing. Many sexual comments are shown. It portrayals conservatives and those with high expectations in a negative viewpoint
|Poor [[moral]]s shown, encourages homosexual agenda, bad behavior, such as smoking, drinking, cursing. Many sexual comments are shown. It portrayals conservatives and those with high expectations in a negative viewpoint.
|$118,871,849
|$118,871,849
|2014
|2014
|NR
|NR
|This two part movie features 4 hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict. It portrays other liberal ideas, such as homosexuality and S&M, in a positive light. In general, this film was labeled as NSFW. Director, Lars von Trier, is known for being Anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.
|This two part movie features 4 hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict. It portrays other [[San Francisco values]], such as homosexuality and S&M, in a positive light. In general, this film was labeled as NSFW. Director, Lars von Trier, is known for being Anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.
|$17,584,083
|$17,584,083
|-
|-
|1997
|1997
|NC-17
|NC-17
|Portrays the porn industry in a positive light, mocks Mormons and the religiously devout.
|Portrays the porn industry in a positive light, mocks [[Mormon]]s and the religiously devout.
|$602,302
|$602,302
|-
|-
|2013
|2013
|NC-17
|NC-17
|French film that promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and graphically shows lesbian sex. Additionally, it falsely idealizes the idea that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children. At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal Steven Spielberg and had a board that included [[Brokeback Mountain]] director, Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize. It is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[homosexual marriage]] eight days prior. At least one of the stars for the film admitted that she felt disgusted by her role in it.
|French film that promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and graphically shows lesbian sex. Additionally, it falsely idealizes the idea that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children. At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal [[Steven Spielberg]] and had a board that included [[Brokeback Mountain]] director, Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize. It is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[homosexual marriage]] eight days prior. At least one of the stars for the film admitted that she felt disgusted by her role in it.
|
|
|-
|-
|1972
|1972
|NC-17
|NC-17
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as incest and [[bestiallity]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light. This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language, one character is even named after a racial slur against white people. Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing. A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close ups of genitalia unlike any non porno film. Liberals call it a comedy, but it is more like an act of Satan.
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as [[incest]] and [[bestiallity]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light. This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language, one character is even named after a racial slur against white people. Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing. A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close ups of genitalia unlike any non porno film. Liberals call it a comedy, but it is more like an act of [[Satan]].
|$7,000,000
|$7,000,000
|-
|-
|1995
|1995
|NC-17
|NC-17
|Pornographic film concerning five underage teenagers in New York City engaging in graphic sex, violent acts, [[drug]]/[[alcohol]] use and homosexual activities.
|Pornographic film concerning five underage teenagers in [[New York City]] engaging in graphic sex, violent acts, [[drug]]/[[alcohol]] use and homosexual activities.
|$7,412,216
|$7,412,216
|-
|-
|2013
|2013
|R
|R
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme. Furthermore, this film promotes feminism and glamorizes the gangster/ghetto lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as weak and insecure.
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme. Furthermore, this film promotes feminism and glamorizes the gangster/[[ghetto]] [[rap music]] lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as weak and insecure.
|$31,724,284
|$31,724,284
|-
|-
|1994
|1994
|R
|R
|Filled with constant vulgar profanity. Previously rated NC-17 before being appealed for an R rating.
|Filled with constant vulgar [[profanity]]. Previously rated NC-17 before being appealed for an R rating.
|$3,151,130
|$3,151,130
|-
|-
|2010
|2010
|G
|G
|Environmental propaganda, with an anti-industry message, is being indoctrinated to children in the animation film.
|Environmental [[propaganda]], with an anti-industry message, is being indoctrinated to children in the animation film.
|$19,202,743
|$19,202,743
|2007
|2007
|NR
|NR
|Romanian film baselessly supports abortion. Liberals praised it when it won the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival
|Romanian film baselessly supports [[abortion]]. Liberals praised it when it won the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival
|
|
|-
|-
|2013
|2013
|R
|R
|Blatantly promotes excessive, endless drug use, portraying it in a positive light and claiming that illegal drugs such as heroin give people the will to keep working hard and stay focused and positive, as well as various forms of graphic and illicit sexual activity and voyuerism, (both heterosexual and in one scene, homosexual) and non-stop use of the f-word and hundreds of other profanities throughout. Portrays capitalists on Wall Street as greedy self-absorbed criminals obsessed with sex, drugs and violence in the form of the protagonist Jordan Belfort. Many audiences were shocked that this did not receive an 'NC-17' rating upon it's release, especially since morality-deprived director [[Martin Scorsese]] broke the ''South Park'' movie's record for most uses of the f-word with his film. Christina McDowell, the daughter of Tom Prousalis, one of the people involved in Belfort's crimes, wrote a memoir on the subject specifically to call out Scorsese and DiCaprio for failing to recognize the victims of Belfort in the film, something even the most praiseworthy critics of the film admitted was a flaw.
|Blatantly promotes excessive, endless drug use, portraying it in a positive light and claiming that illegal drugs such as heroin give people the will to keep working hard and stay focused and positive, as well as various forms of graphic and illicit sexual activity and voyeurism, (both heterosexual and in one scene, homosexual) and non-stop use of the f-word and hundreds of other profanities throughout. Portrays capitalists on [[Wall Street]] as greedy self-absorbed criminals obsessed with sex, drugs and violence in the form of the protagonist Jordan Belfort. Many audiences were shocked that this did not receive an 'NC-17' rating upon it's release, especially since morality-deprived director [[Martin Scorsese]] broke the ''[[South Park]]'' movie's record for most uses of the f-word with his film. Christina McDowell, the daughter of Tom Prousalis, one of the people involved in Belfort's crimes, wrote a memoir on the subject specifically to call out Scorsese and DiCaprio for failing to recognize the victims of Belfort in the film, something even the most praiseworthy critics of the film admitted was a flaw.
|
|
|-
|-
|1997
|1997
|R
|R
|Left-wing film made by Left-wing actors/writers Matt Damon and Ben Afflick, as well as staring Matt Damon. Also notable as being the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American textbook ''A People's History to the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America, due to Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, telling Robin William's character in a pivotal scene "You wanna read a ''real'' history book, read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f**kin’ knock you on your ass.”
|Left-wing film made by Left-wing actors/writers [[Matt Damon]] and [[Ben Affleck]], as well as staring Matt Damon. Also notable as being the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American textbook ''A People's History to the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America, due to Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, telling [[Robin William]]'s character in a pivotal scene "You wanna read a ''real'' history book, read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f**kin’ knock you on your ass.”
|$225,933,435
|$225,933,435
|-
|-
|1995
|1995
|G
|G
|Feminist story about Native American Pocahontas with an environmental message, and also the Native American’s view against English settlers
|Feminist story about [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message, and also the Native American’s view against English settlers
|$141,579,773
|$141,579,773
|-
|-
| 2011
| 2011
|R
|R
|An awful high school teacher, who is always getting high and drunk, tries to get breast-implant surgery, and encouraging cheating and stealing from her students. The movie contains no morals, and is filled with offensive sexual content.
|An awful high school teacher, who is always getting high and drunk, tries to get breast-implant surgery, and encouraging cheating and stealing from her students. The movie contains no [[morals]], and is filled with offensive sexual content.
| $100,292,856
| $100,292,856
|2009
|2009
|
|
|[[Truthers]] Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe blame America for 9/11
|[[Truthers]] Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe blame America for [[9/11]]
|Unknown
|Unknown
|-
|-
|2004
|2004
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Blames obesity on great capitalist paragons like [[McDonald's]] and [[Sodexo]].
|Blames [[obesity]] on great capitalist paragons like [[McDonald's]] and [[Sodexo]].
|$11,536,423
|$11,536,423
|-
|-
|2008
|2008
|R
|R
|"Comedian" Bill Maher tries to convince the audience of the folly of all religion, with special focus on Christianity.
|[[Jewish]] "Comedian" [[Bill Maher]] tries to convince the audience of the folly of all religion, with special focus on Christianity.
|$13,011,160
|$13,011,160
|-
|-
|2006
|2006
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Baselessly attacks Conservative Christianity; incited liberal vandalism of the Bible camp shown in the film.
|Baselessly attacks Conservative Christianity; incited [[liberal vandalism]] of the Bible camp shown in the film.
|$902,544
|$902,544
|-
|-
|2010
|2010
|PG-13
|PG-13
|A 2010 film by Democrat donor Charles Ferguson that blames the Great Recession on Wall Street, deregulation, the Bush Administration. The film whitewashes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's role and claims the financial system corrupted politics. Capitalists are the bad guys.
|A 2010 film by Democrat donor Charles Ferguson that blames the Great Recession on Wall Street, deregulation, the Bush Administration. The film whitewashes [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]]'s role and claims the financial system corrupted politics. Capitalists are the bad guys.
|$4,312,735
|$4,312,735
|-
|-
|2007
|2007
|PG
|PG
|Environmental schlockumentary produced and narrated by actor Leonardo DiCaprio which endorses the theory of Anthropogenic global warming.
|Environmental schlockumentary produced and narrated by actor [[Leonardo DiCaprio]] which endorses the theory of [[Anthropogenic global warming]].
|$707,343
|$707,343
|-
|-
|2014
|2014
|N/A
|N/A
|Environmental schlockumentary spearheaded by ultra-liberal, [[James Cameron]], and featuring several proponents of [[Hollywood Values]] trying to preach the false idea of climate change.
|Environmental schlockumentary spearheaded by ultra-liberal, [[James Cameron]], and featuring several proponents of [[Hollywood Values]] trying to preach the false idea of [[climate change]].
|
|
|-
|-
|2002
|2002
|R
|R
|A 2002 schlockumentary directed by and starring leftist propagandist Michael Moore. It is a pro-gun control film, and distorts facts in favor of gun control. Also included a "Brief history of the USA" segment using animation mirroring that of South Park, that distorted historical facts to make it seem as though guns were implemented by racists, which actually led to the South Park creators to condemn him, enough to give Moore a cameo in Team America as a suicide bomber and make his death especially graphic.
|A 2002 schlockumentary directed by and starring [[leftist]] propagandist Michael Moore. It is a pro-[[gun control]] film, and distorts facts in favor of gun-grabbing. Also included a "Brief history of the USA" segment using animation mirroring that of [[South Park]], that distorted historical facts to make it seem as though guns were implemented by racists, which actually led to the South Park [[libertarian]] creators to condemn him, enough to give Moore a cameo in Team America as a suicide bomber and make his death especially graphic.
|$21,576,018
|$21,576,018
|-
|-
|2010
|2010
|R
|R
|A liberals view of the circumstances surrounding the death of football star and Army Ranger Pat Tillman. The film portrays each and every fact as sinister. Plus, each and every fact is evidence of a conspiracy. Typical Hollywood George W. Bush bashing flick. The bias was clear, make Tillman a liberal atheist anti-war hero that was cannon-fodder for the government. Tillman's actions speak louder than any twisted accusations presented in this documentary.
|A liberals view of the circumstances surrounding the death of football star and [[Army Ranger]] [[Pat Tillman]]. The film portrays each and every fact as sinister. Plus, each and every fact is evidence of a conspiracy. Typical Hollywood [[George W. Bush]] bashing flick. The [[liberal bias]] was clear, make Tillman a liberal [[atheist]] anti-war hero that was cannon-fodder for the government. Tillman's actions speak louder than any twisted accusations presented in this documentary.
|$802,535
|$802,535
|-
|-
|2011
|2011
|Not Rated
|Not Rated
|2011 documentary "feature length lie" is a PBS film regarding the thwarted domestic terrorist attack at the 2008 Republican National Convention and liberals attempt to re-write history.
|2011 documentary "feature length lie" is a [[PBS]] film regarding the thwarted domestic terrorist attack at the 2008 [[Republican National Convention]] and liberals attempt to re-write history.
|NA - TV
|NA - TV
|-
|-
|1972
|1972
|Not Rated
|Not Rated
|The 1972 film about U.S. troops from Vietnam put on record as baby killers, human rights violators, and general disservice to America. This myth was propagated by a few anti-war activist liberal actors that never did see combat in Vietnam and some were never in the country. The initial result was to hold hearings in Congress over the matter. All allegations were proven fabrications, falsehoods, and lies.
|The 1972 film about U.S. troops from [[Vietnam]] put on record as baby killers, [[human rights]] violators, and general disservice to America. This myth was propagated by a few anti-war activist liberal actors that never did see combat in Vietnam and some were never in the country. The initial result was to hold hearings in [[Congress]] over the matter. All allegations were proven fabrications, falsehoods, and lies.
|Unknown
|Unknown
|-
|-
|1974
|1974
|Not Rated
|Not Rated
|A documentary about the Vietnam War that was inherently anti-American in its nature. Also depicts Catholics as bigots. It also had a brief clip at the beginning which had the rolling crew having one of the higher officers forced to talk to them with the false promise that they'd burn the tape once he is finished with it. It also has several moments of graphic sex between soldiers and Vietnamese prostitutes. It also implies throughout the film that several atrocities conducted by the North Vietnamese were done by Americans, including the footage where a girl ends up burned by napalm and running out naked. Noteworthy for being almost single-handedly responsible for forcing America out of Vietnam (even having the NVA mailing the producers thanking them for "ensuring peace" in Vietnam) as well as it being an influence for far-left schlockumentarist/propagandist Michael Moore, with some of its filming techniques even being reused for ''Farenheit 9/11''.
|A documentary about the Vietnam War that was inherently anti-American in its nature. Also depicts [[Catholic]]s as bigots. It also had a brief clip at the beginning which had the rolling crew having one of the higher officers forced to talk to them with the false promise that they'd burn the tape once he is finished with it. It also has several moments of graphic sex between soldiers and Vietnamese prostitutes. It also implies throughout the film that several atrocities conducted by the North Vietnamese communists were done by Americans, including the footage where a girl ends up burned by [[napalm]] and running out naked. Noteworthy for being almost single-handedly responsible for forcing America out of Vietnam (even having the NVA mailing the producers thanking them for "ensuring peace" in Vietnam) as well as it being an influence for far-left schlockumentarist/propagandist Michael Moore, with some of its filming techniques even being reused for ''Farenheit 9/11''.
|Unknown
|Unknown
|}
|}
|1968
|1968
|G
|G
|Controversial upon its release for its Atheistic themes and is notorious for its support of the Theory of Evolution.
|Controversial upon its release for its atheistic themes and is notorious for its support of the [[Theory of evolution]].
|
|
|-
|-
|1985
|1985
|NR
|NR
|Marxist filmmaker, Jean-Luc Godard, decided to retell the story of Mary and Joseph in modern day. As per his business casual, it was ultra controversial upon its release. [[Pope John Paul II]] condemned it, claiming it was likely to offend the deeply religious because of its explicit nudity. Additionally, it depicts Joseph as a womanizing man whore and Mary in a similar light, as there is a montage where she is completely in the nude for no apparent reason. The film was banned in deeply religious countries such as Brazil and Argentina.
|Marxist filmmaker, Jean-Luc Godard, decided to retell the story of Mary and Joseph in modern day. As per his business casual, it was ultra controversial upon its release. [[Pope John Paul II]] condemned it, claiming it was likely to offend the deeply religious because of its explicit nudity. Additionally, it depicts Joseph as a womanizing man whore and Mary in a similar light, as there is a montage where she is completely in the nude for no apparent reason. The film was banned in deeply religious countries such as [[Brazil]] and [[Argentina]].
|
|
|-
|-
|2014
|2014
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Liberals take on the classic story from the Book of Genesis. Going along with their usual M.O., this film shoehorns harmful messages that had nothing to do with the original story, such as Environmentalism, living on a vegan diet, and most notably, the promotion of the [[Theory of Evolution]] as fact.
|Liberals take on the classic story from the [[Book of Genesis]]. Going along with their usual M.O., this film shoehorns harmful messages that had nothing to do with the original story, such as [[environmentalism]], living on a vegan diet, and most notably, the promotion of the [[Theory of Evolution]] as fact.
|
|
|-
|-
|
|
|
|
|Luis Bunuel was an Atheist and was a bigot towards Christians. He would unjustly ridicule Christians in all of his movies and was a pioneer in making this schlock being considered art when really it is just liberal smut.
|Luis Bunuel was an atheist and was a bigot towards Christians. He would unjustly ridicule Christians in all of his movies and was a pioneer in making this schlock being considered art when really it is just liberal smut.
|
|
|-
|-
|2006
|2006
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Promotes the false theory that Jesus Christ married [[Mary Magdalene]].
|Promotes the false theory that [[Jesus]] Christ married [[Mary Magdalene]].
|$217,536,138
|$217,536,138
|-
|-
|1960
|1960
|Not Rated
|Not Rated
|Hollywood perpetuated complete lies about the Scopes Trial in this film in order to smear Christianity, including: portraying William Jennings Bryan as being ignorant, harsh and punitive, based on a false portrayal of his actions and testimony, falsely claiming that at the end Bryan, in a senseless fit of madness, died in the courtroom amid caring and reasonable Darwinists and falsely portraying the Darwinists in a positive light and the Christians as deceitful. In real life, Bryan and the Christians won the trial and were charitable to the end, while the Darwinist Darrow was deceitful in reneging on his deal to take the witness stand after Bryan did.
|Hollywood perpetuated complete lies about the [[Scopes Trial]] in this film in order to smear Christianity, including: portraying [[William Jennings Bryan]] as being ignorant, harsh and punitive, based on a false portrayal of his actions and testimony, falsely claiming that at the end Bryan, in a senseless fit of madness, died in the courtroom amid caring and reasonable [Darwin]]ists and falsely portraying the Darwinists in a positive light and the Christians as deceitful. In real life, Bryan and the Christians won the trial and were charitable to the end, while the Darwinist Darrow was deceitful in reneging on his deal to take the witness stand after Bryan did.
|Unknown
|Unknown
|-
|-
|2011
|2011
|Not Rated
|Not Rated
|Blatantly promotes atheism by depicting, as Atheist screenplay writer Matthew Chapman explicitly put it, the first openly atheist hero in American cinema. Also depicted Christianity, via the character Jon, as being bigoted, abusive, and domineering. It is also to be noted that it received a lot of poor reviews and sales.
|Blatantly promotes atheism by depicting, as atheist screenplay writer Matthew Chapman explicitly put it, the first openly atheist hero in American cinema. Also depicted Christianity, via the character Jon, as being bigoted, abusive, and domineering. It is also to be noted that it received a lot of poor reviews and sales.
|
|
|-
|-
|2002
|2002
|R
|R
|A vulgar sex comedy where the main character has to give up sex for Lent, with his ex-girlfriend trying to tempt him throughout the entire time. Also had the noteworthy aspect of actually being released ''during'' the lent season. This resulted in President of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights William Donohue requesting to both then-Disney CEO [[Michael Eisner]] and Harvey Weinstein that they reschedule the airing of the film, citing that "To show a film that parodies Lent in a most vulgar way is bad enough, but to show it during Lent is outrageous."<ref>http://www.catholicleague.org/appeal-to-michael-eisner-and-harvey-weinstein-reschedule-40-days-and-40-nights/</ref> In addition, despite the inflammatory material in the movie, the [[Anti-Defamation League]] head Foxman did not call out the film.
|A vulgar sex comedy where the main character has to give up sex for Lent, with his ex-girlfriend trying to tempt him throughout the entire time. Also had the noteworthy aspect of actually being released ''during'' the lent season. This resulted in President of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights William Donohue requesting to both then-[[Disney]] CEO [[Michael Eisner]] and Harvey Weinstein that they reschedule the airing of the film, citing that "To show a film that parodies Lent in a most vulgar way is bad enough, but to show it during Lent is outrageous."<ref>http://www.catholicleague.org/appeal-to-michael-eisner-and-harvey-weinstein-reschedule-40-days-and-40-nights/</ref> In addition, despite the inflammatory material in the movie, the [[Anti-Defamation League]] head Foxman did not call out the film.
|
|
|}
|}
==See also==
==See also==
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]]
* [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]]
[[Category:Essays about Liberals]]
[[Category:Essays about Liberals]]