Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 169:
Line 169: + +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 22:26, December 21, 2014
, 22:26, December 21, 2014→Two millionth page view for the "Counterexamples to Relativity" page: @Aschlafly
::::It requires an enormous leap of [[faith]], far more than is suggested by the [[Bible]], to go from what I said to the silly, illogical ''E=mc<sup>2</sup>'' equation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:12, 21 December 2014 (EST)
::::It requires an enormous leap of [[faith]], far more than is suggested by the [[Bible]], to go from what I said to the silly, illogical ''E=mc<sup>2</sup>'' equation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:12, 21 December 2014 (EST)
:::::Does it really? SamHB described a process where '''mass''' disappears - you answered that ''there is nothing startling about an emission or loss of '''energy'''''. This gives the impression that you think of mass and energy as somewhat interchangeable. I know that you don't think so, that's why I asked for you to ''"rephrase your point #3"''. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 17:26, 21 December 2014 (EST)
==Categories==
==Categories==