Changes

:There is a note about where the material came from in the edit summary. My understanding is that that is enough to satisfy the copyright requirements. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 00:03, 14 August 2014 (EDT)

:There is a note about where the material came from in the edit summary. My understanding is that that is enough to satisfy the copyright requirements. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 00:03, 14 August 2014 (EDT)

::Dear PeterKa, once again you did an improper move with Ebola.  We need to record who contributed what so that we can properly attribute it to them.  The attribution is now on the redirect page instead of the Ebola page.  Many thanks! [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 19:08, 4 January 2015 (EST)

::Dear PeterKa, once again you did an improper move with Ebola.  We need to record who contributed what so that we can properly attribute it to them.  The attribution is now on the redirect page instead of the Ebola page.  Many thanks! [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 19:08, 4 January 2015 (EST)

:::The edit summary says it was "moved from [[Ebola hemorrhagic fever]]." I don't see the problem. Even if you forget to do the edit summary correctly, you can put in a "dummy edits" later on to explain where material came. The important thing is that the history of the article can be reconstructed. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 19:42, 4 January 2015 (EST)

:::The edit summary says it was "moved from [[Ebola hemorrhagic fever]]." I don't see the problem. Even if you forget to do the edit summary correctly, you can put in a "dummy edit" later on to explain where material came. The important thing is that the history of the article can be reconstructed. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 19:42, 4 January 2015 (EST)