Changes

: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Bolt-action_Rifles&curid=133817&action=history

: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Bolt-action_Rifles&curid=133817&action=history

: [[:Category:Firearms Components]] - In both of these new categories, I will be creating '''numerous''' articles over the next 12 months, so other editors removing the tag from existing articles like [[bolt-action]] is just creating unnecessary additional work for me in the near future to have to go back and re-add it. Some, but not all of these articles will be part of the new category [[:Firearms Glossary]], [[:Military Glossary]], [[:Preparedness Glossary]].  

: [[:Category:Firearms Components]] - In both of these new categories, I will be creating '''numerous''' articles over the next 12 months, so other editors removing the tag from existing articles like [[bolt-action]] is just creating unnecessary additional work for me in the near future to have to go back and re-add it. Some, but not all of these articles will be part of the new category [[:Firearms Glossary]], [[:Military Glossary]], [[:Preparedness Glossary]]. http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Firearm_Actions&curid=133818&action=history

: Fellow editors: Thank you, in advance, for your patience and following of the guidance from [[User:Conservative]] regarding his advice to not be overly "persnickety" / fastidious about my work in this area. I appreciate it. I promise that over the next 12 months I will re-adjust my categorizations on most of the articles I have edited to be similar to the granularity level seen on Wikipedia. This is quite "granular" however. As I discussed on the phone with User:Conservative, it doesn't mean I will be having each article I edit/contribute having only 1 or 2 categories. As evidenced by the [[James Wesley Rawles]] or [[The Survival Blog]] articles, some articles may have many valid, yet granular categorizations.  

: Fellow editors: Thank you, in advance, for your patience and following of the guidance from [[User:Conservative]] regarding his advice to not be overly "persnickety" / fastidious about my work in this area. I appreciate it. I promise that over the next 12 months I will re-adjust my categorizations on most of the articles I have edited to be similar to the granularity level seen on Wikipedia. This is quite "granular" however. As I discussed on the phone with User:Conservative, it doesn't mean I will be having each article I edit/contribute having only 1 or 2 categories. As evidenced by the [[James Wesley Rawles]] or [[The Survival Blog]] articles, some articles may have many valid, yet granular categorizations.  

:[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 14:31, 14 January 2015 (EST)

:[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 14:31, 14 January 2015 (EST)

::On numerous occasions, it has been pointed out that the user:conservative account is accessed by a number of different people. Yet you state that you were in contact with only one person - ''I told '''him''' I will still be using/creating "granular" categories, similar to how Wikipedia does it '' - Are you saying that the user:conseravtive account is in fact only accessed by one person? And that person is male? [[User:EJamesW|EJamesW]] 15:07, 14 January 2015 (EST)

::On numerous occasions, it has been pointed out that the user:conservative account is accessed by a number of different people. Yet you state that you were in contact with only one person - ''I told '''him''' I will still be using/creating "granular" categories, similar to how Wikipedia does it '' - Are you saying that the user:conseravtive account is in fact only accessed by one person? And that person is male? [[User:EJamesW|EJamesW]] 15:07, 14 January 2015 (EST)