Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,729
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 939:
Line 939: +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 02:16, February 6, 2015
, 02:16, February 6, 2015→What I don't want to happen
:So, I think we are mostly in agreement. Karajou, Cons and I have all advised TAR to focus on writing longer articles rather than just one or two sentences followed by a lot of "See also" links and category lists. I am not objecting to the subjects TAR has chosen, but rather the way TAR adds "See also" and categories into what appear to me to be unrelated articles. Possibly TAR may see a relationship that I can't, but that means that he should add a sentence or paragraph explaining to the reader those implications and relationships.
:So, I think we are mostly in agreement. Karajou, Cons and I have all advised TAR to focus on writing longer articles rather than just one or two sentences followed by a lot of "See also" links and category lists. I am not objecting to the subjects TAR has chosen, but rather the way TAR adds "See also" and categories into what appear to me to be unrelated articles. Possibly TAR may see a relationship that I can't, but that means that he should add a sentence or paragraph explaining to the reader those implications and relationships.
:I would welcome TAR back with the hope that he can clean up his many edits from December and January. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 18:21, 5 February 2015 (EST)
:I would welcome TAR back with the hope that he can clean up his many edits from December and January. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 18:21, 5 February 2015 (EST)
::TAR was under the impression that category tags generate a good amount of web traffic to articles. I showed him that the category tags effect on web traffic to articles is negligible. So I think the "Battle of the Category Tags" is pretty much over. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:15, 5 February 2015 (EST)
== Merge candidates ==
== Merge candidates ==