| − | [[Idaho]] "deserves credit for being one of the few states to refuse to authorize privacy-invading sobriety check points. [[Alex Barron|Bard]] Note: These check points are one of those little “[[police state]], bad thing for a good reason.” We all hate drunk drivers, and we all recognize they are a threat to everyone else, however it is [[unconstitutional]] to pull anyone over without cause. The [[Supreme Court|supreme court]] said “…it is not constitutional, but we will allow it.” Now as you can expect when you let the [[big government]] do one thing that is unconstitutional it does many. They now run dogs up and down your cars and if the mutt “alerts” that is [[probable cause]] to search your car for drugs. They have forced [[citizen]]s out of their cars and taken pictures of their tattoos for identification at these checkpoints. And of course now that the “we” voted to allow DUI check points [[DHS]] is getting involved with check points. This is what happens when you let the government do even a small thing that is unconstitutional. Remember that when [[law enforcement|cops]] pull over your wife coming home and have her dancing in the streets, just because they want too. Many of the [[American Redoubt]] [[Free States Movement|States]] do not allow this evil encroachment on the [[Fourth Amendment]]. On educational policies Idaho really shines, with only nine years of mandated schooling and no regulations on private or [[homeschooling]] other than curriculum requirements. One personal freedom Idaho needs to reform is [[asset forfeiture]]; the state has the same regime as [[Arizona]]. Bard Note: What this does is allow the Police to arrest you for something, then seize all of your [[asset]]s and all proceeds to the police."<ref>279 {{Template:Charles Carroll Society authorized quotation}} February 10, 2015 "[https://charlescarrollsociety.com/2013/03/21/freedom-index-of-the-states/ Freedom Index of the States]"</ref> | + | According to conservative [[Catholic]] [[Alex Barron]] of the [[Charles Carroll Society]], [[Idaho]] "deserves credit for being one of the few states to refuse to authorize privacy-invading sobriety check points. [[Alex Barron|Bard]] Note: These check points are one of those little “[[police state]], bad thing for a good reason.” We all hate drunk drivers, and we all recognize they are a threat to everyone else, however it is [[unconstitutional]] to pull anyone over without cause. The [[Supreme Court|supreme court]] said “…it is not constitutional, but we will allow it.” Now as you can expect when you let the [[big government]] do one thing that is unconstitutional it does many. They now run dogs up and down your cars and if the mutt “alerts” that is [[probable cause]] to search your car for drugs. They have forced [[citizen]]s out of their cars and taken pictures of their tattoos for identification at these checkpoints. And of course now that the “we” voted to allow DUI check points [[DHS]] is getting involved with check points. This is what happens when you let the government do even a small thing that is unconstitutional. Remember that when [[law enforcement|cops]] pull over your wife coming home and have her dancing in the streets, just because they want too. Many of the [[American Redoubt]] [[Free States Movement|States]] do not allow this evil encroachment on the [[Fourth Amendment]]. On educational policies Idaho really shines, with only nine years of mandated schooling and no regulations on private or [[homeschooling]] other than curriculum requirements. One personal freedom Idaho needs to reform is [[asset forfeiture]]; the state has the same regime as [[Arizona]]. Bard Note: What this does is allow the Police to arrest you for something, then seize all of your [[asset]]s and all proceeds to the police."<ref>279 {{Template:Charles Carroll Society authorized quotation}} February 10, 2015 "[https://charlescarrollsociety.com/2013/03/21/freedom-index-of-the-states/ Freedom Index of the States]"</ref> |