Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,458
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + + + + + +
→Quickness to hate God
::::Religious people can doubt their faith, but I wouldn't call them atheists. Why would an atheist doubting atheism make them not an atheist?
::::Religious people can doubt their faith, but I wouldn't call them atheists. Why would an atheist doubting atheism make them not an atheist?
::::Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. What's the '''best''' evidence you have? If your evidence is less than extraordinary, then the lack of extraordinary evidence is evidence for atheism. [[User:Darwon|Darwon]] 18:29, 9 March 2015 (EDT)
::::Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. What's the '''best''' evidence you have? If your evidence is less than extraordinary, then the lack of extraordinary evidence is evidence for atheism. [[User:Darwon|Darwon]] 18:29, 9 March 2015 (EDT)
Darwon, poseur atheists are not atheists.[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/10/evolutionist-posers-naive-evolutionists.html]
[[Atheism is a religion]] and you have no extraordinary evidence for a naturalistic origin of life.
Next, you are being illogical. Historians recognize that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Nevertheless, unlike the religion of atheism which has a total lack of proof and evidence that it is true, Christianity has an abundance of proof and evidence that it is true. See: [[Christian apologetics websites|Evidence for Christianity]].
Lastly, using the definition of atheism that encyclopedias of philosophy use for the word atheism (see: [[Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism]]), please provide us proof and evidence that atheism is true.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:58, 9 March 2015 (EDT)